lol so when I dream of things that aren't even physically possible, then I'm just having the memories of another creature that are somehow stored in DNA. Somehow this delusional horseshit isn't satanic.
Memories aren't genetic. Not all antennae are biological. The shit you're saying doesn't even make sense. A dream feeling different from another dream is not evidence for your claim. Now stop trying to activate schizos fed.
Synchrotistic eisagesis disregarded.
Because genes are inherited and memories are not. What part of the human brain is responsible for memory?
If the trinity is a lie, then the church was wrong, which means that the body of Christ is fallible, which means that the Kingdom of Heaven is not perfect, which means that Christianity is not true, which means that whatever lie you believe about the text is even more untrue.
So you're an antichrist? How can logic exist?
That's not epistemic criteria for logic. That's your personal opinion about a religion.
Yes anons, just accept the new dogma that we're just antennae and that memories are stored in DNA. That way we can fight the dogma.
That's not an argument. How can logic exist? Answer the question without committing a fallacy.
You can't reject logic without using logic. To say that your statement is true assumes that your statement is logical. This violates the law of non contradiction. It's a textbook example of a self-refuting claim.
This is a form of adhominem called "guilty by association." It is such a pathetic example of said fallacy that the association between the two things had to be pulled entirely out of your asshole.
The patterns that high-functioning autists pick up on have a name. It's called syllogism. You, on the other hand, are psychotic.
>>20510004
You have been reduced to face on an anonymous message board. Think about that.
To assume that your statement is true, assumes that it is logical. Something true cannot be illogical. Reality is logical. You can understand without logic, therefore, you cannot be aware without logic. Argiumg for emotions over reason is some female ass shit, nigger.
At least I'm not a dumb fucking pussy that thinks fantasies and emotions are superior to reason.
You talk like we live in the middle of post-vietnam cambodia or some shit. Grow the fuck up. Even if your life involved that much risk, you'd still need to be reasonable.
Acknowledging things happening requires the attribution of identities. The first law of logic is?
You can't justify your belief in reason. Everything other than you doing just that is just filler and distraction from this fact. No arguments, no facts, just irrational, chest-beating, simian retardation.
"Did not realize I had to use philosophical constructs and toss around debate terms to prove a point."
Thanks for telling us all how retarded you are.
I don't actually have to because you haven't justified your claims about the trinity. Any criticism you have about my beliefs is contingent upon you actually understanding them.
No it isn't.
He made an unjustifiable claim about the trinity. He has refused to cooperate with my questioning, and now he wan't me to elaborate on my beliefs that he already proved that he doesn't understand by claiming that the trinity is false. Him not believing that Christianity is true is not evidence that the trinity is false any moreso than that me not believing that LotR is a true story means that some aspect of it's plot or world is true or false.
You're begging the question, but you're so retarded that you probably think that "begging the question" is just a figure of speech.
You don't understand how debate works or how worldviews work, and instead have some schizophrenic idealization of "programming" because logic scares your low IQ.
The debate isn't about whether Christianity is true, retard. The debate is about whether or not the trinity is consistent with christian doctrine, and my opponent is incapable of not using fallacies. I don't actually have to justify shit.
You're too stupid to have a conversation about this topic. You don't have critical thinking skills.
I'm not defending the bible, I'm attacking you personally because logic and reason are prior to understanding and debate. You don't have these things, and thus cannot argue or debate. All you can do is beg the question and ad-hom. Which already proves that you don't care about the truth of the matter, and didn't care whenever you were doing whatever you think "research" is.
You disgrace yourself. You are weak. Do some homework.
The trinity is in the bible. Just because it isn't mentioned explicitly doesn't mean that the father, the son, and the holy spirit don't share the relationship that is described by the trinity. You reject the theology based on personal incredulity, and a general animus against Christianity. Your position has nothing to do with the facts.