pair of gliders?
chkt
there are more "fans" sites now that give the user a larger cut
AI all the rage, now
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DY-sfxTsKzI
Larry "Lucky" Silverstein
Has any anon ever looked into whether he ACKTCHUALLY had a dermatologist's appointment that 9/11?
Funny how Al Capone got sent up on tax evasion rather than murders, is the idea…
>Let’s think about it….why does Nikki do better against Joe than Trump?
thinking
parsing
Nikki does better against Joe
than
Nikki does against Trump?
agreed, Nikbot
why though?
Joe's easy to beat
President Trump, not so much
>What's underneath the mask?
>dough
TYB!
The recent Alabama Supreme Court decision reminds anon of this old logic, which appears to be unstoppably approaching!
Nikki not bound by GOP pledge?
Is Nikki really running, kek?
Tough to run with legs above one's head.
>There is no death, only a shedding of a temporary shell. And you're the one who needs to know.
>38,000meals
Q #38:
38
Nov 02, 2017 1:48:52 AM EDT
Anonymous ID: pGukiFmX No. 147586045
Four carriers & escorts in the pacific?
Why is that relevant?
To prevent other state actors from attempting to harm us during this transition? Russia / China?
Or conversely all for NK? Or all three.
Think logically about the timing of everything happening.
Note increased military movement.
Note NG deployments starting tomorrow.
Note false flags.
Follow Huma.
Prepare messages of reassurance based on what was dropped here to spread on different platforms.
The calm before the storm.
6y, 4m, 1d, 13h, 31m ago
4chan pol
>this coming week is all about the impending and clearly scripted nuclear attack
>on 3.11
3/11 is exactly half a year from 9/11
3/11/11 also anniversary of Japanese tsunami
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0EWbonj7f18
>is there a connection and are the white hats doing this to the food plants?
anon remembers that rabbi talking about McDonalds…
Soylent Green is non-fiction!
yeah, agree with the "processing" plants but what about the chicken farms? anon remembers the thousands of chickens that died in a fire, who were owned by an election official who was being sent a message…
Also: why is she only protecting unknowing recipients?
Shouldn't the law say "you can't kill someone and serve them to anyone, whether they know you're doing it or not"??!?