Donald Trump sweeps Idaho, Missouri and Michigan contests, seizes national poll lead over Biden
Former president rolls up more delegates ahead of an expected Super Tuesday trounce.
Updated: March 3, 2024 8:03am
Donald Trump swept the Missouri and Idaho Republican caucuses on Saturday and captured all 39 delegates at the Michigan GOP convention ahead of Super Tuesday as he marched toward a third straight presidential nomination.
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/donald-trump-wins-missouri-caucuses-one-3-states-choosing-delegates
Kamala Harris calls for 'immediate cease-fire' in Gaza to get hostages out, aid in
"What we are seeing every day in Gaza is devastating," she said.
https://americasvoice.news/justthenews/kamala-harris-calls-immediate-ceasefire-gaza-get-hostages-out-aid/
War Room With Steve Bannon AM Show 3-4-24
https://rumble.com/v4h54df-war-room-with-steve-bannon.html
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
No. 23–719
DONALD J. TRUMP, PETITIONER v.
NORMA ANDERSON, ET AL.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO
[March 4, 2024]
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-719_19m2.pdf
For the reasons given, responsibility for enforcing Section 3 against federal officeholders and candidates rests with Congress and not the States. The judgment of the Colorado Supreme Court therefore cannot stand.
All nine Members of the Court agree with that result.
Our colleagues writing separately further agree with many of the reasons this opinion provides for reaching it. See post, Part I (joint opinion of SOTOMAYOR, KAGAN, and JACKSON, JJ.); see also post, p. 1 (opinion of BARRETT, J.).
So far as we can tell, they object only to our taking into account the distinctive way Section 3 works and the fact that Section 5 vests in Congress the power to enforce it. These are not the only reasons the States lack power to enforce this particular constitutional provision with respect to federal offices. But they are important ones, and it is the combination of all the reasons set forth in this opinion—not, as some of our colleagues would have it, just one particular rationale—that resolves this case. In our view, each of these reasons is necessary to provide a complete explanation for the judgment the Court unanimously reaches.
The judgment of the Colorado Supreme Court is reversed.
The mandate shall issue forthwith.
It is so ordered.