dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump

NEWS CONFERENCE AT 12:30 P.M. AT MAR-A-LAGO! DJT

Mar 04, 2024, 11:50 AM

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/112038446348073350

NOW

Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump

NEWS CONFERENCE AT 12:30 P.M. AT MAR-A-LAGO! DJT

Mar 04, 2024, 11:50 AM

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/112038446348073350

LIVE: President Donald J. Trump Gives Remarks at Mar-a-Lago - 3/4/24

https://rumble.com/v4h6huf-live-president-donald-j.-trump-gives-remarks-at-mar-a-lago-3424.html

https://rumble.com/embed/v4el8n9/?pub=4

NOW

>>20516220

https://qresear.ch/

look it up

President Trump Visits Frontlines of Biden's Border Crisis

0:34

1 hour ago

https://rumble.com/v4h7cdu-president-trump-visits-frontlines-of-bidens-border-crisis.html

https://rumble.com/embed/v4em373/?pub=4

MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

2:20

20 minutes ago

https://rumble.com/v4h7oa0-make-america-great-again.html

https://rumble.com/embed/v4emf39/?pub=4

NOTABLE

>>20516179 President Trump: They worked long [Supreme Court]. They worked hard. And frankly, they worked very quickly, on something that will be spoken about a hundred years from now, and two hundred years from now. Extremely important. Essentially, you cannot take somebody out of a race because an opponent would like to have it that way.

>>20516197 President Trump: I have rogue prosecutors, and I have rogue judges [coming after him]; I have judges that are out of control. And it's a very unfair thing for me, but serving, perhaps as a sample to others of what should not be happening when you make good decisions.

>>20516231 President Trump: A president should be free and clear, and frankly, celebrated for having done a good job., Not indicted four times, and not gone after on a civil basis. And not demanded to pay hundreds of millions of dollars in fines, on something that was absolutely perfect. Where there were no victims. Where the financial statements were absolutely flawless. Where you have disclaimer clauses. I mean, nobody's ever had a thing like this. I wasn't given a jury, and I had a Clubhouse judge just come up with this number.

>>20516247 President Trump: They can go after me as a politician. They can go after me with votes. But they're not going to go after me with that kind of lawsuit that takes somebody out of a race, who is leading in this case, but even if the person wasn't leading.

>>20516257 President Trump: Fani Willis' lover spent hours and hours at the White House, I guess with White House Council and with DOJ, plotting out this plan.

>>20516258

NOTABLE

listening from the beginning

LIVE: President Donald J. Trump Gives Remarks at Mar-a-Lago - 3/4/24

https://rumble.com/v4h6huf-live-president-donald-j.-trump-gives-remarks-at-mar-a-lago-3424.html

https://rumble.com/embed/v4el8n9/?pub=4

Anonymous ID: af2d43 March 4, 2024, 10:01 a.m. No.20516294 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>6354 >>6381

Tom Fitton

@TomFitton

https://www.judicialwatch.org/trump-ballot-dispute/

The United States Supreme Court today made a powerful and unified statement against the brazen, unconstitutional coup by leftists against the constitutional rights of tens of millions of Americans. And, thankfully, a Supreme Court majority seems prepared to stop any shady Biden administration and leftist congressional efforts to overturn a @realDonaldTrump victory based on false allegations of insurrection.

Judicial Watch Statement on Unanimous Supreme Court Ruling on Trump Ballot Dispute - Judicial Watch

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton made the following statement regarding the Supreme Court ruling allowing Donald Trump’s eligibility on the 2024 Colorado primary ballot.The United…

www.judicialwatch.org

Mar 04, 2024, 11:24 AM

Judicial Watch Statement on Unanimous Supreme Court Ruling on Trump Ballot Dispute

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton made the following statement regarding the Supreme Court ruling allowing Donald Trump’s eligibility on the 2024 Colorado primary ballot.

The United States Supreme Court today made a powerful and unified statement against the brazen, unconstitutional coup by leftists against the constitutional rights of tens of millions of Americans. And, thankfully, a Supreme Court majority seems prepared to stop any shady Biden administration and leftist congressional efforts to overturn a Trump victory based on false allegations of insurrection.

In January, Judicial Watch filed an amici curiae (friend of the court) brief along with the Allied Educational Foundation (AEF) in support of former President Donald Trump in his challenge to the Colorado Supreme Court’s unprecedented decision to remove him from the state’s 2024 presidential primary ballot (Donald J. Trump v. Norma Anderson et al. (No. 23-719)).

Judicial Watch and AEF argued that, if the Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling was allowed to stand, presidential and other federal elections would be thrown into chaos:

In a basically standardless legal discussion, charges of insurrection can be levelled by imaginative partisans on the basis of many different kinds of inflammatory political actions or speech. Consider:

Vice President Kamala Harris promoted a bail fund that helped to free “those protesting on the ground in Minnesota” in the wake of the murder of George Floyd. The protests in 20 states following that murder were among the costliest in U.S. history, persisting in some cities for months, and resulting in at least 25 deaths. Protesters attacked federal property and set fire to a federal courthouse. Protests also caused President Trump to evacuate the White House to a secure underground location, as rioters assaulted police officers outside the White House gates.

Discussing an anticipated abortion ruling, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer told a rally on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court on March 5, 2020, “I want to tell you Gorsuch. I want to tell you Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.” His comments were reproved by the Chief Justice of this Court as “dangerous.” Two years later a man was arrested for threatening behavior directed at Justice Kavanaugh.

Recently a number of Republican officials have proposed retaliating for the instant lawsuit by seeking to remove President Biden from their state ballots for abetting an “invasion of eight million” at the southern border of the United States.

On June 10, 2017, Sen. Bernie Sanders called President Trump “the worst and most dangerous president in the history of our country.” Four days later, one of his supporters opened fire on congressional Republicans at a baseball practice, wounding four, including Rep. Steve Scalise.

All of these facts are fodder for interested partisans seeking to disqualify opposing candidates. If the nation does go “down that path,” presidential elections in the United States will become a more ugly business. Legal maneuvers to remove President Trump from the ballots of various states, and the retaliatory maneuvers they provoke, will create a new, anti-democratic front in the partisan wars. To be blunt, “blue states” will apply Section 3 to harass “red” candidates, while “red states” will apply that provision to harass “blue” candidates.

***

The losers in this process, as here, will be the voters.

The Court should foreclose this kind of warfare now. Amici respectfully submit that the Court should refuse to ratify these maneuvers, and should instead adopt as its policy the observation that “[t]he cure for the evils of democracy is more democracy.”

###