>>20518726, >>20518816 Speaking of Immunity… (pb notable)

Does anyone else recall reading or hearing that Obama would be "stripped" (or something like that) of his presidency? I have not heard or seen anything from Mark Taylor for a long time, but I think it was he that said this. I took it at the time to mean that though Obama had been ostensibly the President, the corruption that got him into the office would eventually be seen as so bad that his actions as "president" would be reversed and he would eventually be seen as not having legitimately been president in the first place. No presidential library for him (right to classified documents.)!?

>>20519984

>Can't really reverse his two terms because too much shit, both good and bad, transpired that you could never correct for

Well of course. I think the sense of it was that some of his actions, maybe like pardons, E.O. s and/or removal of godly patriots from the military would be reversed. The whole "I have a pen and a phone." (don't have the exact quote) type garbage perhaps? Evil things that he had no legitimate authority to put in place.

I do also wonder about the Presidential library, too. Those libraries must not do to well if the person who has it doesn't have rights to documents like they are trying to say about Trump (who did have authority).

Haman is rapidly building his own gallows atm if you take my meaning.

https://joehoft.com/alabama-judge-rules-biden-treasury-departments-reporting-mandate-on-corporates-is-unconstitutional/

ALABAMA JUDGE RULES BIDEN TREASURY DEPARTMENT’S REPORTING MANDATE ON CORPORATES IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL