maybe when Haley speaks later this morning she will graciously endorse President Donald John Trump to be the nominee, as she had pledged to do before.

Doing that would show that she understands that it's not about President Trump but about the future of the party.

Americans back Donald Trump as our champion and support him whole heartedly. If she does not back him, too, she shows us that she does not stand with us against those who want to destroy our nation and are squatting in the halls of power, unelected, heedless, and behaving maliciously.

If anyone who supports Nikki and has her ear reads this please tell her "you need to now endorse President Trump and do a Mei Culpa.

>>20525953

of course I meant 'mea culpa'

>>20526012

she does understand, does she not, that she is carrying water for an occupying force of Globalism that is ensconced in the District of Columbia as the Democrats and the Deep State?

In my mind, by carrying on as she has, she becomes an enemy of the liberation of America from the forces of constant war and domination by unelected foreign elites.

>>20526038

St Benidict was in the mountains and became the leader of a monestary and at some point the other monks tried to poison him.

this story is very well known.

The Catholic Church has always dealt with snakes in their midsts.

to expect it to always only have had perfect people and saints within it . . . seems like a false expectation.

And from the Beginning the Church Fathers had to deal with people who took the teachings of Jesus and subverted them, like Simon Magis.

So wasn't it born with issues, always?

some peopel are not pious. They see it as a the government, the power. They want that power. They want to rule.

and then, last century, it is well known that the communists infiltrated the church to bring it low.

Well known.

imperfect people.

the real world.

every institution deals with these issues.

stop blaming 'the Jews'

so did Haley endorse DJT or not?

>>20526097

so she's going into the wilderness.

off into the wastelands of ignoring the real world, and pretending that President Trump doesn't have over 100,000,000 people routing for him.

she seems as thou she's blind as well as unfaithful.

>>20526144

don't give in to it, anon.

remember that when you do you finance the cabal.

>>20526297

do you have a screen cap of that feature.

I don't remember it and don't seem to have ever seen it.

please sauce this.

TY in advance.

>>20526306

they said yesterday here (they being someone shitposting about you) that you were 'doxed' on Saturday, some guy who was weasley in a video saying 'I killed people, ya I killed people' and a chub-bub who was bearded who is supposedly your 'fren' (pleasant face, but chubby)

so you're not doxed? you're not an ex-marine who 'killed people'?

they say you're a neoNazi, too.

so why are you back?

you weren't here yesterday.

>>20526318

the other anon who was trashing Jim said that there was a feature of blue and white text that Jim removed. I've been here since the start of the use of Jim's sites and I do not recall any blue and white text feature. Did you ever see one?

Plus if someone knows CSS and can embed, they can make any color of text that they want to, correct?

I think Jim has done a great job keeping the site up. The shills don't get it: he doesn't run the board or the breads but just the site.

he only steps in to remove illegal content when there is no one else available to do it.

He's great!

>>20526347

well, then

provide a screen cap.

is the feature available on other sites that use Brennan's engine but Jim does not administer?

screen cap it and post it.

so that chubby guy is your boyfriend or just a fren?

>>20526369

still waiting for the screen cap of the blue and white text feature.

since there seems to be NO blue and white text feature I've simulated what it might look like, should it really exist.

of course I've got a white back ground, so the effect is rather confusing for the reader.

what I acually did was type out 'Blue and White Text Feature' and then removed letters and replaced them with spaces for the 'white' letters.

>>20526395

ah, I see, blue text with a white back ground.

that's not quite what it sounds like when you say 'blue and white text feature', anon.

colored text is easy with the CSS and embed, anon. I can do text of any color and any back ground and have it oscillate and this feature was perfected 15 years ago.

so 'fail' on your part.

try to be clear next time 'blue text with a white back ground'.

>>20526395

so if something was dilimited by the three parenthesis on either side it was put into a class 'detected' and would show up as light blue on a white back ground?

and that no longer is a feature and that means Jim is a bad person?

huh.

I'm not buying it.

features get lost, sometimes if they are misused.

attached is a screen cap of what the archive bread markup shows. and the feature is still active if someone marks up their text in this way using an embed so the feature sitll works, and Jim didn't 'take it away' he just made it harder to use if he did anything.

here is a screen cap of that post for which I provided a screen cap of the markup, made today.

this cap was made today two from the archive from a bread from april 3, 2018, as archived.

>>20526462