>>2052482
A rebuttal has been given to SerialBrain's analysis of Q 1675:
Pic related is the jist.
Can be read here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8wgdz3/q_1675_rebuttal_to_sb2s_analysis/
==It is physically impossible to reproduce Q's photo if we demand that the reflection must be that of the physical room around him.
That does not mean Q is a LARP. Two things can be true at once.
Q can both be legit, and Q's image can also not be the reflection of a physical room.
There is no physical arrangement that can reproduce both an accurate reflection of the room AND ALSO a steeply angled, upside down apple logo.
baker notable
If the suggestion is that the photo is displayed on a screen, the reflected off a phone angled towrads the screen - then i agree with that compoletely.
the problem is that SerialBrain and many others in here are insisting that the image we see reflected on Q's phone is hte physical room around him, and that Q must have been sitting in POTUS's chair in order to take such a photo.
That idea is FALSE.
The computer screen hypothesis works perfectly given what we see in Q's picture.