Anonymous ID: 813398 March 7, 2024, 9:33 a.m. No.20531277   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1299

>>20531244

>the guy shows Jesus with a communist flag and wonders why he gets deleted

 

"If you want to be perfect, sell off everything you have, give the money to the poor, and come follow me".

 

"The love of money is the root of all evil"

Anonymous ID: 813398 March 7, 2024, 9:37 a.m. No.20531309   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1369

>>20531290

 

Q said freedom of information. No filters. Called out all the banks and how the elite screw over countries, and you think a pic with a communist symbol, which even Q has posted communist symbols should be deleted?

 

If you flip off a cop and he arrests you, he's a domestic enemy to the constitution and should be treated as such.

Anonymous ID: 813398 March 7, 2024, 9:39 a.m. No.20531328   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>20531299

 

I agree, now ask yourself if certain people have controlled it like they control capitalism and turned it into that. ALL of them are corrupt because ALL of them are controlled by the same people.

Anonymous ID: 813398 March 7, 2024, 9:48 a.m. No.20531382   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1411

>>20531369

 

So you don't care if an officer who swears to uphold and defend the constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic, himself violates the constitution by being a tyrant and unlawfully arresting a free person for exercising their right as a free person?

 

You live in a delusion. Your attitude is why tyranny exists.

Anonymous ID: 813398 March 7, 2024, 9:57 a.m. No.20531428   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1465 >>1512

>>20531411

 

No, the COP does it by violating the law and falsely arresting him. The cop violated 18 USC 242 and belongs in prison.

 

Flipping off a cop is not interference, either is telling them off. According to the US Supreme Court, the right of citizens to verbally challenge and protest police action without thereby risking arrest is one of the chief characteristics by which we distinguish a free nation from a police state.

 

If a cop is triggered, it's on the cop. They shouldn't be a cop.

Anonymous ID: 813398 March 7, 2024, 10:11 a.m. No.20531501   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1504 >>1512

>>20531465

 

No. ANY cop in the USA that arrests someone for flipping them off has violated 18 USC 242.

 

If I'm unlawfully arrested, yes my day has been inconvenienced, but the lawsuit will be worth it.

 

No, if you trigger someone into sinning it's not automatically a sin, that's nonsense. Many people are triggered by the Truth, telling them the Truth is not a sin. The pharisees were triggered by Jesus.

 

Performing a constitutionally protected activity that the cop swore to uphold and defend triggering that cop into violating the law and sinning is on the cop, not the person performing a constitutionally protected activity.

 

There's nothing to respect about police. Every single member of law enforcement in the United States is in violating of their oath. They're public servants who forgot that and think they're our rulers, and violate the rights of the people daily. Just read the 4th, 5th, and 14th amendments then look up civil asset forfeiture. Corrupt government courts decided government thugs can do exactly what the constitution forbids government from doing, and NONE of those who swore the oath to the constitution are doing anything about it. That's just one example too.

Anonymous ID: 813398 March 7, 2024, 10:16 a.m. No.20531513   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1520

>>20531504

 

Wrong again. Auditors flip off cops to audit the cops reaction and record if the cop violates the law. The auditing community is growing fast and of great public interest.

 

Is that a sin? IF so in your mind, what about police bait cars, undercover ops, prostitution stings etc?

 

Police are PUBLIC SERVANTS, they're not authorities. We the People are the authorities. Cops need to remember that.

Anonymous ID: 813398 March 7, 2024, 10:20 a.m. No.20531531   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1563

>>20531520

 

No, I mean auditors. You know many are on the right, and several are ex law enforcement who smartened up.

 

When police violate your rights, the only lawful recourse is suing. Then those who do are called "litigious conflict mongering trolls".

 

Look at Jeff Grey who sues for the symbolic amount of $1791 and an apology.

Anonymous ID: 813398 March 7, 2024, 10:24 a.m. No.20531553   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1555

A cop is in the intersection, directing traffic. You're angry because he makes you stop. you flip him off, the cop loses control of his ego and arrests you.

 

The cop is now a criminal and should be in prison for a year, as per 18 usc 242.

 

I can do these too kek

Anonymous ID: 813398 March 7, 2024, 10:58 a.m. No.20531703   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>20531616

>you say that the officer is a public servant.

Yep.

 

>a person who feeds you in a restaurant is also a servant, the serving staff.

Not a public servant

 

>do you flip them off or do you treat them with respect?

That depends. Did they forget they're my server and think they're my ruler and can give me orders? Did they take an oath not to spit in my food and then do it in front of me?

 

>do you abuse your servants, anon?

No but I'll beat the fuck out of one who thinks they get to abuse me or others.

 

>you act like it's perfectly OK and only the officer is to blame if he gets triggered.

 

It is. It's a constitutional right that the cop took an oath to uphold and defend. If he gets triggered it's 100% on him and he has no business being a cop.

 

>you make him less and treat him badly.

The cop took the job of being a public SERVANT. Reminding them of their place is not making them less. When on duty, they are SERVANTS, not rulers.

 

>you act like he must be a pius angel, even in the heat of battle.

He must obey the law. If law enforcement are themselves lawless, there is no law and order. Just tyranny and chaos fighting tyranny.

 

>it's unrealistic.

Not at all

 

>whatever you say the law is, there is a higher law of respect for servants, serve the servant.

I will respect the servants when they respect their masters. WE THE PEOPLE are the authorities, not the cops.

 

>you seem to not understand that and make excuses for the fowl mouthed jerks who flip off an officer in the line of duty.

You seem to not understand that it's a constitutional right cops are bound to uphold and defend.

 

>so you suffer the consequences if you really do that.

The consequences of being free and NOT breaking the law?

 

So when a cop gets shot trying to unlawfully arrest a citizen they're just suffering the consequences of their unlawful actions. Glad we can agree on that one.

 

>and if you do get run over by a truck, well, you can say 'technically I was right, I can question authority' but you'd still be in the hospital, most likely.

Once again, cops aren't the authorities. We the People are. I'm not questioning authority, I'm reminding them WE have the authority. THEY are the ones not accepting We the Peoples authority. You're arguing it's ok for a cop to break the law kek.

 

>whatever dude, use the law to abuse the servants if you think that's cool. but it isn't. and you know it's not. abusing servants is always wrong.

When the servants forget their servants and think they're our rulers, it's our right and DUTY to put them in their place.