>>20531128

https://www.texastribune.org/2024/03/07/xcel-energy-texas-wildfires/

"

Homeowner Melanie McQuiddy filed the initial lawsuit against the company in Hemphill County on Friday, claiming that a splintered pole ignited the fire when it fell. On Saturday, Canadian businessman Salem Abraham told The Texas Tribune of his plans to file a suit this month against Xcel and Osmose Utility Services, a Georgia-based company that inspects Xcel's equipment, over the pole for damages to his ranch and his brother’s land.

"

The basics of power pole managment:

power poles get old and NEED replacement periodically.

In New England this happens all the time.

the problem seems to be when companies are bought by outside interests and the poles are just left to rot.

and in California they get helped to fall down by chainsaws, so it seems.

the 'buy it and let it rot' methodogy of utility company aggregators in the leveraged capital industry, who are really just money managers and not utility specialists, is wide scale societial failure! So sad.

In california you could use the Google maps walk about feature and inspect the poles and see 'huh, all of these poles are very very old and need to be replaced'

>>20531126

>>20531192

I heard that President Trump is going to do a play by play while Biden speaks, so maybe you can watch that as it plays out in Social Media.

I'm not sure if it will also be broadcast.

https://www.rsbnetwork.com/news/trump-to-give-rapid-response-rebuttal-of-bidens-state-of-the-union-address/

>>20531217

the rule was if they have more than 10% of the posts.

but that rule lets them just go nuts.

and keeps you busy because every time you delete them they go back to 0 posts.

rate of posts is what it is, too much all at once that have no value are a hinderance.

but also those long winded posts that quote Q out of context and then go on and on about such and such corruption of some organization when we all know that every organization is subject to possible corruption.

the guy shows Jesus with a communist flag and wonders why he gets deleted . . .

>>20531251

see:

>>20531230

>>20531271

I don't delete anything.

Nor would I.

but those who are communists posting here would be the most likely to be deleted, would they not?

let me see: Communists are open hostle towards Christians so . . . there is that.

it's like if you flip the bird to a police officer, maybe it seems 'wrong' to you that he comes over and arrests you, but what is he, a saint?

>>20531302

It's a Q research board.

and it's occupied by a touch crew who like to delete jerks and conflict mongers because they feel we are at a state of War, when the rules change.

so here you are trying to start a fight with a guy who does not support censorship and has called out the censorship over and over and suggested to our august board-crew that they make more breads and not censors, even people like you who want to start fights and cause conflict and spend your day posting insults to those who are here interacting and observing.

you do you, I do me, and BV does BV.

we all know that the BV are warriors against what they perceive is BS of enemies of the the board so . . . why are you ragging on me and insulting me when I'm here observing and pointing out how ridiculous the ones who DO get deleted behave.

>>20531309

and when the person who does it is being arrested they can go 'whaa whaa whaa, you brute, you tyrant, and you're so manly and beautiful, I'd love you but you hate me and are arresting me . . . wha wha' and they triggered the officer, and they cause him problems, and later in life they meet up with him and recognize him and realize how much they actually loved him, even though they were jerks to him back in the day before they grew up.

and they don't say 'oh, you were a domestic enemy' but say 'oh, gee, do you remember me. I was such a jerk to you. What was I thinking. I'm so glad I didn't ruin you're career.'

that's the story I'd like better than 'ruin him for getting angry'

live in the real world not the fantasy world of 'everyone is an angel and never gets triggered' and don't flip the bird to a cop.

>>20531382

who says I don't care?

I see the one giving the finger as teh problem. The officer is busy, on the job, dealing with all kinds of issues, and in harms way, and some punk triggers him and ruins his career by filing false arrest charges. I see the one giving the finger as the problem. The officer made a mistake, arrested someone by accident.

but you know in many cases it's not illegal to arrest someone who is interfering with an officer in the line of duty.

when I think of how officers are often first on the scene to find casualties after a drunk crash, or get plowed down by a drunk drivers, or people sleeping at the wheel, or get shot at just for wearing a uniform, maybe never making it home, and then I see your 'constitituion 'splaing' making excuses for treating these guys like they are jerks, when they are not, I think 'why does this person not get it? there has to be officers of the law. and if you get rid of a type of police, then some new type of police arrises.'

try to see them as people,anon,not as some villian from a narrative of Marxists.

the marxists would replace the police with their own police.

it's a human being, anon, not a theoretical persona who is perfection.

if you trigger him, you triggered him and you are also at fault if he does wrong.

>>20531311

not sure if he's be live on camera, but he says he'll be posting on social media in real time during the speech calling out lies, etc.

I think it will be fun to read along with President Trump even though I am loath to watch Biden.

usually the SOTU adress is a big deal here at Q Research. Who can for get the 'Two trains' and the times up buttons, and then the times up truck the next day, two trains, though you might not know that there were two trains unless you read about it here.

>>20531428

technically you are correct in some cases, anon.

in other cases, not so much.

and if you do trigger an officer, and he does arrest you, you got arrested, didn't you.

your day was hijacked.

you ended up in jail.

and most of the time nothing will happen to the officer, despite your idea that 'only angels should be police'.

police are real men, and they are not perfect.

once again: if you trigger someone into sinning you are also sinning yourself.

Do you understand or is your morality just grandstanding and platitudes and lacking in love for real people. Cops are real people, you should love them too.

and guess what, if you respect them they are usually far more helpful and a lot less likely to 'throw the book' at you.

>>20531463

maybe he will. not sure. I thought that too at first but investigated and it seems like he'll be on social media.

It won't be till tonight and we'll find out in real time what President Trump does.

(like a mystery science President Donald Trump opining in silhouette form, on the bottom left of the screen, making wise cracks and debunking Biden's nonsense)

>>20531497

greetings, trickster, who brings

laughter and love!

>>20531501

you're right. but if you do it with the intention of trigger them than it is.

good point.

seriously, if you do interact with an officer of the law think of their well being and pray for their safety silently in your heart.

ask for their protection.

don't be a sychophant (they don't like that either).

and if you do need to 'question authority' don't do it while they are on the job.

they are a service person and need to know that you understand that.

have a nice day.

>>20531504

I mean ask for their protection as a silent prayer, not that they should protect you right then and there, unless you do need help.

then ask.

>>20531513

'auditors'

you mean litigious conflict mongering trolls of the left?

>>20531526

A cop is in the intersection, directing traffic. You're angry because he makes you stop.

you get out and walk out through heavy traffic to question 'what the F are you dong here' and get run over by a truck.

oh well.

you should have wrote a well meaning letter to the civic hall.

>>20531555

you say that the officer is a public servant.

a person who feeds you in a restaurant is also a servant, the serving staff.

do you flip them off or do you treat them with respect?

do you abuse your servants, anon?

you act like it's perfectly OK and only the officer is to blame if he gets triggered.

you make him less and treat him badly.

you act like he must be a pius angel, even in the heat of battle.

it's unrealistic.

whatever you say the law is, there is a higher law of respect for servants, serve the servant.

you seem to not understand that and make excuses for the fowl mouthed jerks who flip off an officer in the line of duty.

so you suffer the consequences if you really do that.

and if you do get run over by a truck, well, you can say 'technically I was right, I can question authority' but you'd still be in the hospital, most likely.

whatever dude, use the law to abuse the servants if you think that's cool.

but it isn't.

and you know it's not.

abusing servants is always wrong.

>>20531553

PS: I wouldn't filp off a cop for any reason.