Anonymous ID: 2dd5f1 March 8, 2024, 12:44 p.m. No.20537660   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7671

>>20537641

kek yeah Kuntsler's prolly right about the only plan left for them is the summer of violence

That's as likely as anything else what will finally verify Q's early drops about the NG activations and the clean-n-swift Booms to follow.

Anonymous ID: 2dd5f1 March 8, 2024, 12:56 p.m. No.20537709   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>20537671

The Deep State FFs can rhyme, but they're rarely twins.

So, I don't see the usual scamdemic nor usual election fuckery happening this time.

It's gotta be all the migrants flowing into the country.

I believe many of them receive those Obamafones so some of that stuff Q hinted about them may come into play.

Anonymous ID: 2dd5f1 March 8, 2024, 1:02 p.m. No.20537725   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7728 >>7730 >>7751

>>20537694

The cheerleader section of the Board Police here aren't the biggest fans of the truth.

Particularly when it's seen as slandering any /ourteam/ members.

It shouldn't be like it is on a site centered around the tenets of Q but in 2024 it do.

Anonymous ID: 2dd5f1 March 8, 2024, 1:42 p.m. No.20537876   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7886

>>20537859

The 2022 one is sketchy due to being from no usual opsec / no re-verify with PDJT "Q".

You can do wtf you want, but I don't consider it legit until if/when a re-verified Q verifies a graphic of it like he did back on /pol/.

Anonymous ID: 2dd5f1 March 8, 2024, 1:56 p.m. No.20537943   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7956

>>20537916

If he could only post while PDJT was in office then there's merit to your post.

But, there's no sauce for that.

However, nobody will ever convince me that Q's history shows it would be no big deal to start posting again with a stale TC and no re-verification with PDJT.

Anonymous ID: 2dd5f1 March 8, 2024, 2:06 p.m. No.20537991   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7996 >>8019

>>20537971

That's a stretch.

The only grammatical error the OP made was the "," at the end of the quotation where a "?" was expected to be.

Perfectly understandable even with that.

You just pulled out the adhom because you got BTFO'd.

Many such cases.

Anonymous ID: 2dd5f1 March 8, 2024, 2:18 p.m. No.20538053   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8109

>>20538015

Objectively, no.

She has a bigger jaw than most men do which is a huge impediment to making it into the drop dead gorgeous category.

You have to bring moar feminine physical characteristics to the table than she's able to bring.

Not her fault, she couldn't control being born to her parents their DNA combination that made her.

Sucks, but life's not fair.

Anonymous ID: 2dd5f1 March 8, 2024, 2:26 p.m. No.20538093   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8098

>>20538055

That particular anon is the last one still using the Everyone Is OSS line.

Nobody else from either side of the QR Civil War still harps on about water under the bridge topics like he/she does.