once again the "i thought this was a free speech board" bots are back trying to drag the board down.

here is how it works: content that is reprehensible is spammed, usually disparaging Jews, but sometimes also other groups.

that content is often deleted.

everyone knows that that content is often deleted.

It's been that way for over a year here.

anyone who uses these breads knows the deal.

and then, after the content is delete someone posts 'blah blah blah, free speech'

and when anyone reminds them that, by the way, if you want your own board . . .

they go into the 'so you support censorship, your worse than a NAZI' speil or something of that nature.

another one is the slide 'if you flip off a cop' which they did yesterday.

they have no respect for the police, but the police are suppose to behave like holy angels all the time even when faced with foaming at the mouth depravity from 'auditors' who profiteer off of law suits.

these trolls are here a lot lately and the best tactic is to let the heathen rage.

but I know, some of the anon will get into it with the trolls.

if you're talking smack and putting down the BV, the BO, or Jim W then why are you here?

I'm not looking for an answer. I supose it's that you'd have to be a paid-for havoc troll.

even if you don't like censorship you know better than to smack talk hatefully to the ones who run the bread.

and if they are here they do take criticism as long as it's respectful.

that is all.

>>20537912

since I just composed that copy you did not see it yesterday.

>>20537926

bored anon.

bored with your nonsense.

I've told them that I don't like the censorship.

I don't tell them to die in a flaming car wreck.

>>20537953

not true, anon.

>>20537957

so fake

>>20537974

if there are really 107 different occurances of the same exact phrase that I type out, off the top of my head, less than twenty minutes ago, please make screen captures of them and post them to show me.

you are such a fraud.

>>20537987

that's real useful anon.

I was here yesterday and doing battle with a 'it's OK to flip off a cop' shill so maybe I used phrasing that was similar.

but I don't copy paste my old posts to a new bread unless it's a news story at the end of the bread and when I do I say 'this was posted late last bread'.

you kind of owe me an apology but I know it's probably too hard for you to do that.

>>20537997

?

a common phrase shows up a lot.

'why are you here' is a very common phrase used by millions and millions of people, anon.

still waiting for an apology. I am not a copy-paste pro BO troll, as you accuse.

I do also say 'live in the real world' so maybe I repeat that.

people do repeat what they have said before. That does not make them a 'copy-paste pro BO troll' does it now, hummmm

>>20537978

and anon's guesses are all wrong.

so you are one of those magical thinkers? you guess and it must be true?

good bye all your false accusers and board trolls.

you come here to make it hard for the anon and you fail every single time.

'all these other posts are you and you are worse that the worst of the worstest worst' you rage.

If you are here to smake tock about BEE OH,

then maybe you can suggest some deodorant that the one who smells could use to make the odor less?

now search on that sentence and see how many times it shows up exactly in any other bread? I bet you don't find another copy of it at all ever.

but now someone will copy and paste and use it again.

oh the sorrows of being able to type quickly and be creative with letters, words, phrases, and paragraphs: some people steal what you input with your fast moving finger tips.