This the appropriate bread at the moment?
Only one since the catalogue issue before I went to sleep?
This the appropriate bread at the moment?
Only one since the catalogue issue before I went to sleep?
Sparse information available about him, as is expected with any swamp creature they had time to wipe off the internet. Almonds are telling me that’s the guy right there. Looks like a sick fuck.
Never did get that alleged water disaster he was looking for for his water filtration company to do disaster relief for. Company is trading for fractions of a penny now I believe.
Leslie J Kessler is the current CEO of PureSafe Water Systems. Also seems to be scrubbed from the interwebs.
Yeah fuck it shills are retarded and can’t find it. Keep it this way. We’ll send out info to masses from here.
Never doxx your altitude faggot! Kek.
I think Q leaves out a lot of the theories that have been thoroughly debased by the canal on purpose, so as to not be too easily dismissed. This gives FEtards hope.
Oh wow, this is yuge and I had no idea about it. This paragraph in particular kind of makes your point.
“Another option discussed has been selling a stake in Aramco to China instead of doing an IPO, which would raise a similar amount of money. People close to the process said there have been no active talks about such a sale recently. One person said China is less interested in Saudi crude oil and is more interested in buying Iranian oil at a discount after U.S. sanctions scare away other buyers this year.“
https://www.wsj.com/articles/doubts-grow-aramco-ipo-will-ever-happen-1530813982
Common misconception. It isn’t great on paper. It is evil all the way around. Stop ceding the moral ideal to this murderous collective nonsense.
Nothing is good in theory if it is not good in practice. That is what makes something good. How it actually works.
You motherfukers need some Ayn Rand in your life. Learn.
[Consider the catch phrase:] “This may be good in theory, but it doesn’t work in practice.” What is a theory? It is a set of abstract principles purporting to be either a correct description of reality or a set of guidelines for man’s actions. Correspondence to reality is the standard of value by which one estimates a theory. If a theory is inapplicable to reality, by what standard can it be estimated as “good”? If one were to accept that notion, it would mean: a. that the activity of man’s mind is unrelated to reality; b. that the purpose of thinking is neither to acquire knowledge nor to guide man’s actions. (The purpose of that catch phrase is to invalidate man’s conceptual faculty.)
That is capitalism, socialism is equal outcomes. Appreciate the concession. That catch phrase always grinds my gears.