Nobody wants to be dragged anywhere against their will but suggest you calm down and just keep digging.
Baker, the other respondent is baker who collected the notes for #25200.
Try not to step on another baker's toes.
cc: >>20548055
Baker posted notes for 25200 here:
Baker said they are complete.
If baker posts notes and it's not an e-bake, by custom, another baker does not get to change them afterwards wo/permission of baker who originally posted. Suggest you discuss with him.
>should not mess with notables from previous breads unless specifically stated that they are partial notes
True enough, this is never done. Not a formal rule, never needed to be, because all bakers understand not to do it. Would cause chaos to have bakers changing other bakers' notables wo/permission.
>i'll ask anons about which set of notables they want.
Not a good solution. Bakers are not lone wolves. Need to be able to work together and tolerate other bakers' decisions about notes. Diggers can repost, which can give more exposure (an advantage).
on this board, where else?
appreciate your openness and willingness to create quality notes
after baking for more than five years, would observe that no two bakers ever agree about exactly what is notable.
TY for baking,
o7.