TY BAKER!!!

Previous Bread:

>>2055093

If we're not getting a response, considering "who all is here", then I would take that lack of response as intended. I like to re-read crumbs when stuff like this happens. Q posted this and didn't link to anyone in the thread. They just showed up, posted this, and that was that.

>>1620282

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1620151.html#1620282

This might be out of context, but, hey; ya never know. Also, keeping an eye on >>>/patriotsfight/

>>2055318

You had absolutely nothing to do with this. Do you idiots work in shifts? I'm genuinely curious.

I'm getting SHIT HAMMERED over twitter for defending Q, right now. I'm not sure what's going on, but some of these people are losing their grip over all the proofs Q has posted.

4-6% starting to show up for the big reveal?

>>2055955

That's the thing! There's tons of proof, and they still call foul because of how it's presented. There's no winning some of them.