>>20555140 (pb)
LOL. He "unwittingly" carried newspapers in boxes that contained classified plans that were leaked to said newspapers. That's the gag. That's why this case will fail.
>>20555503 (lb)
What does that say about everyone else?
The literal definition suggests "without being aware". As in he was unaware he was carrying classified documents. The gag is, they are playing along with the charge. The charge is bullshit for two reasons:
-
Yes, presidential records act. So Trump's covered.
-
They weren't classified docs, as alleged. They are newspapers that contain leaks of classified information to the press.
It's a boomerang either way, both ways, and at the same time. Double whammy, you see. It's a trap, son. They been snared and don't even know it.
>That's an important marker for me, a big FU to satan.
The real awakening wouldn't be glorifying something that doesn't exist. In other words, belief systems, while they have their place and should be allowed no matter what, will be proven mostly a lie based on myths and legends that were intended to be the original matrix keeping people locked into a self-monitoring lifestyle.
The problem with that is 2-fold. 1-There is a subset of the population that would fall directly into nihilism. 2-Something of adequacy will have to take its place other than coercion by way of overbearing law enforcement. So the question is, which way are they going to go with it? What are the ethical ramifications of such an arrangement?
Every time we do that we get pulled into another conflict that "just so happens" to draw us in out of our best "interests".
Hard to go to renfest and not enjoy yourself. Talented folks living a tough life to entertain everyone and not getting paid near enough for it.