Anonymous ID: d53d5a July 6, 2018, 9:37 a.m. No.2056167   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6182 >>6184 >>6186 >>6191 >>6195 >>6200 >>6215 >>6236 >>6336 >>6475 >>6486 >>6729

Serious question here…

 

If we are watching a movie… why do we dig?

If Q has everything already… why do we dig?

 

It seems like nothing we dig about ends up mattering… especially when we get no real confirmation that we're correct about anything…

 

The latest picture of the guy in HK comes to mind. Why dig further into this? I feel like I'm being sent on a wild goose chase with it… why does the answer of "who do you see?" matter?

 

I feel like I'm putting a ton of effort into … not much of a purpose.

 

Help!

Anonymous ID: d53d5a July 6, 2018, 9:41 a.m. No.2056206   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2056186

Huh, I like that 20/80 reference… I heard it long ago, but in a different context.

 

80% of the work you do only matters 20%… but the remaining 20% of the work you do is yields 80%.

 

The take-away from this is… mundane work is necessary and doesn't give you much… but you have to do it, to get to that last 20% that brings in the big results…

 

That begs the question: Are we still in the first 80% that's only yielding 20% results?

Anonymous ID: d53d5a July 6, 2018, 10:29 a.m. No.2056796   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6815

If there's one thing I have learned from the Q movement, it's that big government is bad… A government that can give you everything you need, can take away everything you need as well… It really highlights the need to limit the scope and size of government.

 

Y'all should read this book to learn why libertarian ideas are the only logical conclusion you can come to.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/1521853177