Anonymous ID: 46c11b March 15, 2024, 9:23 a.m. No.20571816   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1845 >>1857 >>1954

>>20571727 pb

>Lindell running a X space

 

>regarding supreme court filing

 

-was the case that ML wanted to do in every state

-started spring 22

-kari lake and mark finchem

-arizona court ruled no standing

-in the election massive machine failures

-jared contradicted himself about the ballot size 19 in ballots

-maricopa used altered software which was a felony

-didn't do mandatory l&a testing

-then 9th circuit sanctioned the lawyers including dersh, parker and olsen

-case filed with SC yesterday and still needs to be docketed

-once docketed people can see the case. new evidence will shock

-because it was kicked onstanding, new evidence is allowed.

-ML believe will be 9-0

-this isn't subjective evidence that you're gonna see

-there's other states added

-gotta spread this story

-rawstory - david edwards. fake news spin.

-case is about the defective voting devices not lake for governor.

-hussein judge said case could go forward because voting machine experts said devices are defective

-halderman hacked in with a ball pointpenflipped votes in front of judge in GA case

-halderman report unsealed.

 

Taking questions now

space is "glitching"

 

MC didn't do any of the l&a testing on the tabulators

Anonymous ID: 46c11b March 15, 2024, 9:33 a.m. No.20571845   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1857 >>1954

>>20571816

>MC didn't do any of the l&a testing on the tabulators

-Because the case was kicked on standing, they can add loads of "new shocking" evidence

 

-case was filed with emergency and ML hopes it's heard really fast

 

-petition of certiori - judges shouldn't have kicked out on standing.

 

passwords Q: about passwords

>Col Shawn Smith answers

Antrim authentication keys were stored in plain text. and some machines were configured with widely known default passwords

Deparnolaw.com has the reports

Anonymous ID: 46c11b March 15, 2024, 9:36 a.m. No.20571857   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1954

>>20571816

>>20571845

>passwords Q: about passwords

>>Col Shawn Smith answers

 

Our election officials:

 

The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which people with limited competence in a particular domain overestimate their abilities. It was first described by Justin Kruger and David Dunning in 1999. Some researchers also include the opposite effect for high performers: their tendency to underestimate their skills. In popular culture, the Dunning–Kruger effect is often misunderstood as a claim about general overconfidence of people with low intelligence instead of specific overconfidence of people unskilled at a particular task.

 

Numerous similar studies have been done. The Dunning–Kruger effect is usually measured by comparing self-assessment with objective performance. For example, participants may take a quiz and estimate their performance afterward, which is then compared to their actual results. The original study focused on logical reasoning, grammar, and social skills. Other studies have been conducted across a wide range of tasks. They include skills from fields such as business, politics, medicine, driving, aviation, spatial memory, examinations in school, and literacy.

 

There is disagreement about the causes of the Dunning–Kruger effect. According to the metacognitive explanation, poor performers misjudge their abilities because they fail to recognize the qualitative difference between their performances and the performances of others. The statistical model explains the empirical findings as a statistical effect in combination with the general tendency to think that one is better than average. Some proponents of this view hold that the Dunning–Kruger effect is mostly a statistical artifact. The rational model holds that overly positive prior beliefs about one's skills are the source of false self-assessment. Another explanation claims that self-assessment is more difficult and error-prone for low performers because many of them have very similar skill levels.

 

There is also disagreement about where the effect applies and about how strong it is, as well as about its practical consequences. Inaccurate self-assessment could potentially lead people to making bad decisions, such as choosing a career for which they are unfit, or engaging in dangerous behavior. It may also inhibit people from addressing their shortcomings to improve themselves. Critics argue that such an effect would have much more dire consequences than what is observed.

Anonymous ID: 46c11b March 15, 2024, 10:03 a.m. No.20571954   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1964

>>20571816

>>20571845

>>20571857

 

>Can conn Q

SHerif Dar Leaf and remote access by serbians in michigan. discovered on Nov 5 there was remote access. case dismissed

 

<Col Smith A

can't be any moar dangerous

 

>ML

>Col smith

vote in person day of

 

>Question about people being black pilled and not voting

<ML Answers

Goes on Lindell type rant with the messages is basicallywe are the news nowincluding a mention how the media went silent for17 daysafter he released absolute proof