>>20575237 Paper is better than what we have, agreed but

>>20575127

Paper can be hidden, burned, drop boxes, unverifiable after and not replayable, kept in a postal truck, duplicated, over or undersized and the machines can spit them back out in a minute after you are pressured to leave the area after you vote as was done in NY.

Full proof is the only way. And it has to be "Replayable" and that can only be done by recalling a ballot to see if it was 1. counted 2. not tampered with.

>>20575281

See, now if you are called anti-semitic you can answer with "no, I am pattern matching" now we are no longer on the defensive and the conversation does not change but we now have a defense against this tactic.

Can you answer the one about being offended?

>>20575266

>>20575296

read this about paper ballots

>>20575127

They will always cheat and leave, what I propose means "Nowz youz can't leave"