I propose for a new (old) system.
It's simple.
Paper.
Pens.
That's it.
Yes, I'm an election scientist.
Exactly.
Computer shit means literally "trust the screens".
Anyone can verify that a paper ballot is a paper ballot.
Anyone can verify that a pen is a pen.
No one can verify that computer + screen does what some self-proclaimed $expert says
"But my system is secure"
beep wrong
"But my math is perfect"
beep wrong
It's literally
"Trust me, I'm le expert"
Also plus: RESTRICT POWER.
> And I am 99.99% sure they could never break what I propose
lmao
Can we shoot you when you are wrong with your computer shit?
I will tell you something: there is tons of firmware everywhere, including even the fucking screens. One can hack the firmware of the screen to make it show something that your program doesn't show.
Now what?
>numerous issues
way way way less than computer shit has.
Also anyone can check voting and protect the ballots.
No one can check computers and protect digital bits.
If you think you can, you are a fool.
>shitcoin
lmao
you are indeed a fucking fool.
>server side encryption
lmao
everything is compromised.
if you were an actual expert, you would know that.
that's why experts put a sticker over built-in cameras and/or even physically cut the wires, because that's the only way to be sure.
>on your device such as a tablet, cell, or computer
hackable, hackable, hackable, and hackable
>but in addition the information that you provided such as contact info, form of id: SS, DL, or Passport, who you voted for
Screen says "you voted for Trump"
Cell shit transmit: "you voted for Biden"
>Even if you could manage to ever do that in your lifetime, it would still only affect one vote.
Do what?
Hack your cell garbage phone?
Things like that are done AUTOMATICALLY.
You think glow niggers do that manually?
>contact id, form of id, SS, DL or passport
Why bother?
Glow niggers already know who that cell shit phone belongs to anyway.
>What I propose is a private key based on you and your information that lives on your machine that no user nor server knows
Tell me, you are one of these guys who use 2 factor authentication and instead of using a hardware token, you use your smart phone, because you think you are so smart.
>private key
>on computer/cell/tablet
>no one can get this key, because it's on my computer
lol
That's what's so brilliant about 2-factor auth using a shit phone. You don't even know that an attacker got your private super secret number and can calculate his own pins on his own hardware.
>the apps
you are a dumb mother fucker.
>trust ze app
>trust ze OS
>trust firmwares
>trust ze OS on top of the OS
>trust ze networks
>you have to hack all the shit phones manually
no, you don't. You do that automatically.
>trust ze server
I don't
I don't trust ze server
I don't trust any electronics
I don't trust you
>but the hash
lol
You know the actual problem on top of the nonsense you are posting is that you are voting for either one millionaire or another millionaire to be the president of the US corporation.
Can you vote away the fake US dollar?
Can you vote away the gold framed US corporation?
Can you vote away the IRS?
#notmysniffingpotato
>shitphones aren't getting hacked
lololol
>NFT
lololol
>shitcoin
beta test for CBDC, where you even deliver all your transactions YOURSELF to a centralized global book, and you are even so stupid to pay for it.
It's literally a glow niggers dream.
You are dealing with feds, with literally unlimited funds, and you think their shit phones would be "secure".
You must be a millennial.
You do not even understand how computers actually work.
>nothing exists
>I will use a new special programming language, which will be hack-proof to write muh app
lmao
Millennial confirmed.
>btw. cell, tablets, computers etc. also do not exist, the ones I will create will all be hack proof
lollololol
>it will use the internet that I will create, which also will be hack proof
lolololol
>weight
of what?
Your shit phone, or your own overweight fat ass?
>serial number
of what? Your shit phone?
>price
of what?
>Write me a queries
Engrish
Even you just taking your shit phone everywhere makes it obvious to whom it belongs to. And the glowies know (and plenty of others too).
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/12/19/opinion/location-tracking-cell-phone.html
So what you are trying to do here is also making elections non-anonymous on top.
Brilliant, really brilliant.
Is that you, Joe?
>they stole
So from whom did they (whoever "they" is) stole the shit phones from?
From whom did they (whoever "they" is) stole the internet from?
The internet exists to track you.
Your shit phone exists to track you.
And you even pay for it all, because you are fucking stupid, Joe.
>IP hops constantly
>writes Engrish
>complains that his badly worded sentences cause questions to pop up
>I have already wrote this
lmao
You sure have.
Did you also already wrote this new unhackable programming language too, Joe?
>it's all unhackable
>in theory
lmao
Did you also wrote your own unhackable shit phone OS too using one of these programming languages?
But you wrote that they should, idiot. For your retarded electronic election shit system.
>the feds has my name, but they don't have my SS or passport number
lmao
you are really fucking stupid
>trust the government
>trust the feds
lmao
>"but in addition the information that you provided such as contact info, form of id: SS, DL, or Passport"
>you provided
>there's no ballot info on your shit phone, except for the super sekret private key
lmao
>when I enter something temporarily on my shart phone and delete it immediately, it's no longer there
lmao
you are even more retarded than I thought
>but you see, the secret key is calculated by my server, and that makes it all super secure
lmao
show me those "pedo images"
>I
I don't trust (you).
End of your retarded idea.
>put the hash on a thumb drive
>hide it somewhere
How does this make any sense?
>they
Who is "they"?
The feds?
The feds already got your social security number, retarded fat ass. They don't have to break into your home to figure it out. They don't have to break into your home for anything that you sent them digitally.
>it's just one vote
lmao
tracking is automated and global
>a trail
>on a compromised unsecure device
>and on the server
>that is controlled by the feds and/or by a fucking moran
yep, millennial confirmed
>nothing is deleted
ever
>in this system
no, nothing is ever deleted, dumb fook
>it's over
not when you digitize shit.
it's over when you stop with the electronics and go the path of the Amish
>Big Data
>Here is an example.
https://qresear.ch/?q=These+people+will+not+learn+if+you+send+them+pestilence
>I bet you get nothing
lmao
>and this is just one little site
lmao
>the problem is retrieving it
NSA exists, dumb fuck.
>but but that's unfair!!!
>hurr, anything the fake news reports is legit
>they would never lie about TOR being not controlled and a perfect place for criminals, TOR is legit and anonymous
lmao
you are a very low IQ millennial.
>Feds are just ordinary people
>your fear
Me putting a sticker on cameras is a precaution, and it works. And it's not because of fear, but because I know what's technologically possible and that the camera LED is software controlled.
And it doesn't even have specifically to do with glow niggers, but also with any other hacker.
You on the other hand
>YOLO
>my device is unhackable
>I wrote this app with my special unhackable programming language, and I'm more intelligents than all glowies
>it's super secure
I'm imitatings yous
>the problem is election fraud
>with a server in the hands of the ones controlling the elections, everything will be fine
>I trust whatever the fake news writes
>they totally sued Apple, this means my EyePhone is safe and effectives
>because I trust Applerino
>IP hops
>but but Applerino
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/08/apples-plan-think-different-about-encryption-opens-backdoor-your-private-life
>but but Apple cares about the childerinos
>Security is hard, just as hard as it is to defend your car or house
>implying Apple + Goolag are interested in actual secure software + electronics
oh boy
>Remember
>they
who the fuck is they?
No, the NSA uses tools that are not available to you.
>but Goolag
No, Goolag uses tools that are not available to you.
>but Goolag search
>but Goolag are the good guys for sure
>Apple are also the good guys with their EYE-devices
omg
Linux is shit software either written by retards or glowies
https://itvision.altervista.org/why.linux.is.not.ready.for.the.desktop.current.html
Linux developers have a tendency to a) suppress news of security holes b) not notify the public when the said holes have been fixed c) miscategorize arbitrary code execution bugs as "possible denial of service" (thanks to Gullible Jones for reminding me of this practice - I wanted to mention it aeons ago, but I kept forgetting about that).
Here's a full quote by Torvalds himself: "So I personally consider security bugs to be just "normal bugs". I don't cover them up, but I also don't have any reason what-so-ever to think it's a good idea to track them and announce them as something special."
Year 2014 was the most damning in regard to Linux security: critical remotely-exploitable vulnerabilities were found in many basic Open Source projects, like bash (shellshock), OpenSSL (heartbleed), kernel and others. So much for "everyone can read the code thus it's invulnerable". In the beginning of 2015 a new critical remotely exploitable vulnerability was found, called GHOST.
Year 2015 welcomed us with 134 vulnerabilities in one package alone: WebKitGTK+ WSA-2015-0002. I'm not implying that Linux is worse than Windows/MacOS proprietary/closed software - I'm just saying that the mantra that open source is more secure by definition because everyone can read the code is apparently totally wrong.
Year 2016 pleased us with several local root Linux kernel vulnerabilities as well as countless other critical vulnerabilities. In 2016 Linux turned out to be significantly more insecure than often-ridiculed and laughed-at Microsoft Windows.
The Linux kernel consistently remains one of the most vulnerable pieces of software in the entire world. In 2017 it had 453 vulnerabilities vs. 268 in the entire Windows 10 OS. No wonder Google intends to replace Linux with its own kernel.
Many Linux developers are concerned with the state of security in Linux because it is simply lacking (this last link is much recommended).
>I will just use a LIEbrary
you sure do.
>it will be safe+secure+effective
It sure will.
>Most of the tools are based on previous works
How would you know?
You have no access to NSA tools.
The Linux kernel consistently remains one of the most vulnerable pieces of software in the entire world. In 2017 it had 453 vulnerabilities vs. 268 in the entire Windows 10 OS.
THAT'S FACTUAL.
this
t. low IQ moran
>you either have to use Linux, controlled by a literal Marxist, or Windows 11
incorrect and false
>tracking is the OS, not the browser
You use Firefox
Firefox has tons of tracking built-in "telemetry"
Cope
>fanboi
You are fucking retarded.
>this
>but muh that other telemetry
>the fact
>you don't know
I do know, I also know that Linux is not an alternative, but controlled opposition with tons of security holes for glowies, telemetry and more shit.
I myself fly with Windows 7, thank you very much.
>zero control
So you check every single Linux update by yourself?
Wow.
You must be very skilled with computors.
>dimwit
lol
for you once more so that maybe you finally get it, my little fanboy.
In reality the argument is that everything is insecure so we should stop using banks, social media, anything that has to do with any type of computers.
>this
Of course you can't accept this, despite it being the truth.
All sorts of corporations changing stuff in Linux too, first of all IBM
>But I love the Marxist Linus and IBM, totally trustworthy
lol
>ha ha
>why would he use Windows 7
>you must use either Windows 11 or Linux (which is even impossible, just use one of these totally trustworthy distros)
>that's the only valid choice
Sad.
There are up-to-date browsers without telemetry for Windows 7, you know.
Oh right, you don't know.
>slide
in a 7 hour thread with 5 notables, lmao
stop shitposting
>I started updating myself, that means I checked every single update myself for any new problematic code
Nope, but nice try.
>but others would notice
Who? The others that also do the same lazy shit as you do?
cough OpenSSL
100% SHIT CODE
https://www.csoonline.com/article/562859/the-heartbleed-bug-how-a-flaw-in-openssl-caused-a-security-crisis.html
No one fucking cared
>but it was fixed.
The ones who fixed it figured out that OpenSSL code AS A WHOLE was complete insecure CRAP (anyone taking a look at the code could have figured it out), riddled with buffer problems and more garbage, that's why they dumped the whole shit show and created a new one.
And SSL is one of the most important things on a networked computer.
No one fucking cared.