>>20575106

I do not argue I provide logic. You are right when you say paper is better then the current electronic systems and I agree. But what I propose goes far beyond what any of you realize, it is tamper proof. Paper can be hidden, burned, drop boxes, unverifiable after and not replayable, kept in a postal truck, duplicated, over or undersized and the machines can spit them back out in a minute after you are pressured to leave the area after you vote as was done in NY.

What's the chance of me taking full control of your device, knowing your exact ballot cast, and knowing the one of thousands of combinations of encryption algorithm and salts that it was encrypted with. Just about zero.

>>20575609

The part that you also do not understand is that they have to control your device too. If you they did change your vote, that would leave a trail on the device too and on the counting server, nothing is deleted in this system. It's over for all of them.

>>20575611

Then why do they cry to Apple? You buy into the fear porn. Feds are just ordinary people but your fear makes them into all knowing .