I am just trying to make people think more logically. Pattern Matching is part of Logic. They fought me on that in the beginning too when I introduced it but now the use it here all the time, which is a good thing because now they have to the tools to combat the narratives more logically. For example, your anti-Semitic, wrong, I am pattern matching, and if all 17 people who testified about Russia, Russia, Russia, were Jewish that is not anti-semitic, it is pattern matching. Before that they would twist the narrative and then the conversation would always go to defending your non biases instead of focusing on the crime pattern.
Same here, "one of" is how they get their "experts" to be qualified in courts without any arguments from us or the courts.
Logical Thinking, I am looking to give them tools not trying to hurt them, but if I have to poke them to see that they are still alive, well…