Anonymous ID: 52d8ff July 6, 2018, 12:18 p.m. No.2057867   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7901 >>7929 >>8146

>>2057732

That was me you responded to, still maintaining that you elect to look at this from a pessimist POV and you're entitled to that opinion of course, you just can't expect us or Q for that matter, to drop what we're doing to assuage your concerns. I can see what's getting done and I can see it's getting done "by the book", which isn't just a slow process, it's a downright fucking boring one but necessary nevertheless.

Anonymous ID: 52d8ff July 6, 2018, 12:30 p.m. No.2057982   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8247

>>2057920

CB? No worries man. AFLB is right, the index worked after a bit but be wary because that was the first thing I went to and it didn't work right away. Everybody just kinda went into panic-mode, not expecting it. Was a good wake-up call though.

Anonymous ID: 52d8ff July 6, 2018, 12:35 p.m. No.2058032   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>2057929

I can just see where you're coming from is all. The scientific method is also a "by the book" idea and can get boorish like the legal process Q is going through to punish those people doing wrong, some have faith, some have facts, all should show an appropriate level of discernment to be sure.