I'm just going to post this again since no one reads to the end of the thread. Again, just one man's opinion.

>>2057571

I don't think there is any problem with being skeptical and irritated when it is July and nothing of substance Q promised has come to light. Q has suggested that massive public revelations would be happening imminently since November. So far Zilch. Trump is an amazing president, but the Q stuff- arrests, disclosures, voter fraud, the hidden tech, ect. has so far all been a massive bust. Q may not have explicitly stated certain dates (although in some cases he has), but he has strongly suggested that a lot would come out before now. So far it has been a massive disappointment.

I think this should be discussed and I think Q should be forced to give an accounting for his seeming lack of results. If Q is bullshit, whether it be a deep state op, propaganda from Trump team to keep the more fringe elements of his base interested, or just an extremely sophisticated LARP, then evidence for or against those theories should be taken seriously. Especially at the current date. If Q is bullshit, then he should be exposed, so that the base can focus on practical matters like the midterms, and think about what we can legitimately hope for out of this presidency, and how we can plan for the time when Trump is gone.

>>2057780

I come from the traditions of the old chans that got Trump elected. A place where truth is valued above all else. All sides of an argument were considered, and debated, which enabled one to arrive at the real truth. Bad arguments from any side were not accepted. Sure people name called and insulted, but it was usually recognized that when one reached that level they had lost the debate. This is one of the fundamental reasons why free speech is so important. When one is talking about worldwide geopolitics that will affect all of our lives, I believe all sides should be considered. Faith is fine in moderation, but when faith starts to contradict logic and blinds you from what actually is or is not happening, then it can become a big problem. We are men, not children. Logic should not be discarded because we want to believe. I still have a little hope that Q might deliver, but I think there is a good chance that it is all bullshit. Regardless I think Q's drops and their extraordinary claims should be subjected to rigorous debate. We should try to destroy Q's assertions and claims, and then if we can't, we will know that we may have something real. Blindly following along with no skepticism is just childish and is not befitting of free men. If Q is real, then ultimately it wont hurt him if we dissect the truth or falsehood of his claims.

>>2057867

You respond in a reasonable and intelligent manner which I respect, and I appreciate that you respect my point of view. I just think there is value in skepticism and true debate. All great scientific discoveries were first subjected to rigorous attempts to discredit them before they became accepted as fact. This is a necessary part of the scientific method. Without it, no one would no what to believe, and no practical value or progress in understanding from science could be gleaned. When it comes to geopolitics and war, I think the scientific method is a more appropriate approach to address issues than religious level faith that shouts down dissenting opinion. This is supposed to be a research board, not a congregation.