Anonymous ID: 0d183d March 17, 2024, 7:27 p.m. No.20583921   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3934 >>3948

Dear America and rest of Western World

 

Your government is funding everything it can to destroy you!

 

Not one item from congress/parliament benefits the people!

 

NGO's and Think tanks are working directly for the old money controlled executive service implementing an agenda no one voted for in all countries, while media and the body politic create distractions to stop you addressing the infiltration and subversion of your state.

 

You are paying for your own destruction! Every western nation is being flooded with third world migrants putting enormous pressure on infrastructure, causing homelessness as the state funds the migrants giving them advantage over the people. This is TREASON of the highest order.

 

And yet everyone keeps playing the game!

 

Make a noise or go silently into the night!

 

Peace and Grace to (You)!

Anonymous ID: 0d183d March 17, 2024, 7:37 p.m. No.20583991   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Supreme Court Rules Public Officials May Block Their Constituents On Social Media

 

Public officials may block people on social media in certain situations, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously on March 15.

 

At the same time, the court held that public officials who post about topics pertaining to their work on their personal social media accounts are acting on behalf of the government. But such officials can be found liable for violating the First Amendment only when they have been properly authorized by the government to communicate on its behalf.

 

The case is important because nowadays public officials routinely reach out to voters through social media on the same pages where they discuss personal matters unrelated to government business.

 

“When a government official posts about job-related topics on social media, it can be difficult to tell whether the speech is official or private,” Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote for the nation’s highest court.

 

The case is separate from but brings to mind a lawsuit that several individuals previously filed against former President Donald Trump after he blocked them from accessing his social media account on Twitter, which was later renamed X. The Supreme Court dismissed that case, Biden v. Knight First Amendment Institute, in April 2021 as moot because President Trump had already left office.

 

At the time of the ruling, the then-Twitter had banned President Trump. When Elon Musk took over the company he reversed that policy.

 

The new decision in Lindke v. Freed was written by Justice Amy Coney Barrett.

 

Respondent James Freed, the city manager of Port Huron, Michigan, used a public Facebook account to communicate with his constituents. Petitioner Kevin Lindke, a resident of Port Huron, criticized the municipality’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic, including accusations of hypocrisy by local officials.

 

Mr. Freed blocked Mr. Lindke and others and removed their comments, according to Mr. Lindke’s petition.

 

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit ruled for Mr. Freed, finding that he was acting only in a personal capacity and that his activities did not constitute governmental action.

 

Mr. Freed’s attorney, Victoria Ferres, said during oral arguments before the Supreme Court on Oct. 31, 2023, that her client didn’t give up his rights when using social media.

 

“This country’s 21 million government employees should have the right to talk publicly about their jobs on personal social media accounts like their private-sector counterparts.”

 

The position advocated by the other side would unfairly punish government officials, and “will result in uncertainty and self-censorship for this country’s government employees despite this Court repeatedly finding that government employees do not lose their rights merely by virtue of public employment,” she said.

 

In Lindke v. Freed, the Supreme Court found that a public official who prevents a person from comments on the official’s social media pages engages in governmental action under Section 1983 only if the official had “actual authority” to speak on the government’s behalf on a specific matter and if the official claimed to exercise that authority when speaking in the relevant social media posts.

 

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/supreme-court-rules-public-officials-may-block-their-constituents-social-media

Anonymous ID: 0d183d March 17, 2024, 7:43 p.m. No.20584019   🗄️.is 🔗kun

The Jewish Billionaire & Oligarch who created the murderous and criminal underground in Haiti

 

The New Republic published a stunning article on Gilbert Bigio, Haiti’s only billionaire oligarch, in 2022. According to the article, he is the man who enabled “Haiti’s murderous gangs.” What the article never even remotely stated was that Bigio is Jewish, and that his son, Reuven, is “an honorary consul of Israel in Haiti,” along with other relatives.”[1] Bigio himself is a former consul of Israel in Haiti. The Miami Herald tells us that the Bigio “purchase of Jeffrey Epstein’s $132,000 Mercedes Maybach was buried at the end of a 418-page document accounting for the estate’s finances in the third quarter of 2020.”[2]

 

The New Republic stated in December 2022:

 

“In a stunning new development amid the smoldering crisis in Haiti, Canada has imposed stiff economic sanctions on Gilbert Bigio, who is often described as the richest man in Haiti. The Canadian foreign ministry accused Bigio, along with two other superwealthy Haitians, of using their economic power ‘to protect and enable the illegal activities of the armed criminal gangs’ that are tearing the country apart. For years, Haitians have said Bigio and other oligarchs are complicit in the violence strangling the nation: This year 1,448 people have been killed, with another 1,005 kidnapped for ransom. Until now, however, the international community has stayed mostly silent about Haiti’s corrupt elite.

 

“Canada’s bold move should end the mistaken view in the outside world that the gang violence, which has brought 60 percent of the capital, Port-au-Prince, to a virtual standstill, is nothing but savagery contained in poor neighborhoods. As one local online publication—the respected AyiboPost—explained, the Bigio family’s broad economic holdings include its own recently constructed private port of Lafito, just north of the capital. AyiboPost speculates that Canada may have information indicating that the gangs have been able to use the port to import some of the heavy weapons that are outgunning the beleaguered Haitian police.”[3]

 

Given all of that, you would think that The New Republic would mention something about Bigio’s Jewish background. However, it’s quite amusing to see how they wrote about it:

 

“The Bigio family is part of what is often called the ‘Syro-Lebanese elite’—the descendants of people who immigrated in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries from various parts of the Middle East. There are estimates that Gilbert Bigio, the 86-year-old patriarch, is worth $1 billion, although no one knows for sure. It is a matter of public record that in 2020 he bought a Mercedes Maybach luxury auto for $132,000, quite a statement in a nation where an estimated 4.7 million people—nearly half the population—are experiencing “acute food insecurity.”

 

Bigio is part of the Syro-Lebanese elite, yet there is no mention of the fact that he is Jewish, or that the Mercedes he purchased was recorded in an accounting document from the estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The Miami Herald continued to say:

 

“Until recently, the younger Bigio appeared to be supporting a presidential comeback by Martelly. But following the announcement of sanctions, Reuven Bigio and others in Haiti’s private sector have been meeting to come to a new accord, even agreeing to sit down with longtime business rivals over dinner to discuss Haiti’s future.”[4]

 

To discuss Haiti’s future? It seems these people believe they own the country and can do whatever they want! Again from the Miami Herald: “The Bigio family, like others in Haiti’s powerful economic class with a major foothold in the economy, prefers to operate behind the scenes.” Another words, just like the civil rights movement, they operate behind the scenes so that the average man or woman doesn’t know that they are the ones playing with political remote control. “But increasingly their business dealings are coming under scrutiny by an international community desperate to bring the country’s gang violence and rampant kidnappings under control, and in the process clean up Haiti’s destabilizing political arena.”[5]

 

https://www.vtforeignpolicy.com/2024/03/the-jewish-billionaire-oligarch-who-created-the-murderous-and-criminal-underground-in-haiti/