I've been investigating this Pershivelt theory, which takes the roots of the Q op and traces it back 160 years and finally taking a more prominent role with Teddy Roosevelt and Gen Pershing. In summary, Q exposed a lot of lies and liars, but Q itself, being a psyop, is also full of lies and liars, albethey good lies and undercover agents willing to do unspeakable shit for a much greater good. Basically, following Q only peels back the onion so far. "but wait, there's moar!"
It got me thinking about 9/11 and I asked myself a question that I've never heard anyone ask: Were the people who demolished the WTC buildings a different group than the ones that attacked the buildings with airplanes.
For example, was the plane attack a cabal op to blame the Saudis and get us into war with them, not realizing that the good guys had rigged the buildings to demolish and make the whole thing much bigger than intended in order to co-opt the intended blame of the terrorist event? Was destroying Building 7 and the Pentagon necessary to erase the good guy planning?
Sure, massive collateral and human damage, but perhaps it was a decision of the lesser evils in a much bigger game as well as no ability to prevent the event altogether.