>Engoron was the one who also denied it.
Engoron cannot stop his "appeal" to have the right to a jury. It is his right to waive = have one or not , not a district judge. The Appellate division is there to see if legal procedures were applied correctly.
An appeal is available if, after a trial in the U.S. District Court, the losing side has issues with the trial court proceedings,
That includes being fined before an appeal is rendered regarding how legal procedures were applied..
>>20590341 Sauce?
We have to look to the constitutional amendments and see if they are being followed because that would Trump state laws. They probably just recently changed that and m ost likely it is not even the law just something they put on their website to get Trump.
While states may decline to allow traditional criminal appeals, they are not free to have no corrective process in which defendants may pursue remedies for federal constitutional violations. That means they cannot stop Trump from appealing violations of Due Process of the law, so he does not have to pay if that appeal is regarding the violation of his 6th Amendment rights to a fair and impartial jury.
.Let me reiterate: they are not free to have no corrective process in which defendants may pursue remedies for federal constitutional violations.
Article III of the U.S. Constitution guarantees every person accused of wrongdoing the right to a fair trial
That one came from
The Judicial Branch | whitehouse.gov
National Archives | (.gov)
https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov › judicial-branch
Article 3 Clause 3 Trials
The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed.
Trump was denied Due Process of the law and his 6th Amendment right to a fair trial by jury. So not only does the 6th guarantee it but it is in Article 3 clause 3 too. They cannot stop appeals of due process no matter what.
>after 911 we got indefinite incarceration
This is the right of every American citizen.
Where the case to be remanded to lower courts for further proceedings consistent with SCOTUS opinion and still the lower courts refuse to comply, i.e open rebellion, SCOTUS could rule that non-compliance by lower courts constitutes contempt, and an order could be issued for the removal (in some form) of offending parties (we may presume, the justices of the lower court). The statute outlining court power allows on order of imprisonment for "disobedience or resistance to its lawful writ, process, order, rule, decree, or command". Federal marshals would then arrest non-compliant judges, unless the marshals too are in open rebellion. If the judges in question were federal judges, the marshals would have to decide whether to obey the order of SCOTUS vs. the order of the district or circuit court. Since under the US Constitution states that "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish", it is objectively established that SCOTUS rulings are superior, so provided that the marshals elect to uphold their oath of office, they will enforce the SCOTUS ruling. However, citizen action becomes irrelevant once SCOTUS has made its ruling, and the matter has moved from legal determination of fact to enforcement of established fact.
President Trump: You need to prosecute this judge for judicial misconduct for not following precedent, in which the appellate decisions over rule his actions. This is one of the jobs of the US
Supreme Court and it must be heard.