>>20595589

problem with hologram theory (promoted by John Lear)

is that the trajectories of the different "planes" shown on TV, do not resolve.

That was what convinced me to TV Fakery POV

(which was never promoted by the government ops but harsely shouted down, Lear worked for C1A)

I found it on an astronomy site.

Astronmers are used to resolving distance of stars via parallax effect. The astronomer blog/site / forum was all over it.

They demonstrated how the various "planes" (south tower. only Tower with more than one fake image) did not resolve.

anybody listening to impeachment Biden hearing?

easy link?

An "expert" with a computer toured the Country with a lecture allegedly proving the various angles of approach actually resolved.

Unfortunately for most people they were conned.

He did it with computer simulation, which can be easily faked.

It was trickery. How do you know?

Because, ror one, ou can see with your own eyes that the various shots baldly do not resolve.

Crude video showed it early on.

"What is TV Fakery?"

>>20596058

Truth is short.

Lies are long and involved?

?

>>20596076

>>20596058

Purdue "engineering" computer simulation, was "in on it"

It was a large conspiracy

Just as we see now with the

Eugenics Program

"Stop Trump at any Cost" routine.

i wonder why.

>>20596058

might me more difficult to prove this to yourself, meow?

They took the array of clips from the 3 networks down from the net.

Expunged the archive too.

Helicopter from NJ shot was definitely erased from there, last I heard.

the one of two which showed the "nose - out" the other side of the Tower.

The long shot, also, fails to show the "plane" approaching.

>>20596137

might be more difficult to prove this to yourself, meow?

the array of clips from that day; the collection, has been washed-out long long ago.

Perhaps archives will prove fruitful. I never went through them, since I studied off the originals.

Analysis vids remain though. Scattered.

Nothing disappears from the Internets.

>>20596600

BBC giltner

>>20596634

"goes in one side and out the other"

"like, like, a bad special effect"

>>20596784

i mis-quoted, from memory

you can see the explosion only occurs once the "plane" has chilled inside for a while

"completly in one side and out the other"

"It just disappeared, like a bad special effect."

[revelation of the method?]?

"INCOMPREHENSIBLE", is the trigger word.

it's suggesting that you will fail to understand what you see ; which is true!

Or becomes true.

See how they direct your attention?