TYB
(PB) post included me in the "FED" category of an anon. Rest assured I'm no FED. Could have been, but even at that time the Agency that wanted me, purpose was specific and seemed righteous. What was told to me by the Group I would be tasked with members, and later was broken wide open and made publicly aware, is the largest violator of the law I would have been sworn to uphold, was a large US intel agency. They were routinely busting the CIA importing drugs in from South America.
Needless to say I never went to the academy. They guys I did keep in contact with back then got so tired of not doing the work they thought they could make a difference doing ( heavy on the conscience of a good man), they laterally transferred to the US marshal's service. With no additional in Academy training as well.
Theres more if you're all willing to listen.
Believe me or not, I don't care honestly.
So why did Q stop posting. He literally said in pretty clear terms, the op was over. What was the reason? From my knowledge of my area of expertise I can only say what I know. Assuming by how connected the group was, it had to mil, intel and likely both.
In military and intelligence ops there are very specific reasons for them to wrap up.
-
Mission objective accomplished.
-
Time-bound mission. Ends regardless of meeting objective.
-
The eminent probability of threat to life and/or exposure or capture of sensitive intelligence.
-
Burned operation. Discovered. Usually domestic.
Choose to believe me or not, but I can tell you there were several operations that were patriot run, that during the end of Trumps term, beginning of Bidens, where certain agencies were actively working to find locations of underground operations, what was compromising intel was possibly scooped up and who the people were that were involved and what was the authorizing and supporting ranking members and staff.
Literally cloak and dagger cat and mouse. The operations had to shut down even though they were legal. It was well known and no secret the incoming administration was absolutely willing to break the law in any way to achieve an objective.
Again choose to believe me or not. Up to you. I honestly don't care. But what I can tell you is I moved to Florida in 2020 from the northeast and was offered a job at MacDill AFB.
Never claimed to be right anon. I'm just giving insight into possibilities based on experience. They are logical, because that's the criteria.
Whether any of them are THE actual reason for Q? You decide.
My bad anon. maybe I mixed them up. From my memory in 2022 from his last appearance, I got the feeling he was gone for good. I assumed I would remember thinking that from something he posted.
The constitution allows them to protect themselves when the federal government fails to do so.
It's clear given the Supremes decision to allow Texas to continue until the appeals court hears the case, that if texas loses the appeals court, the supreme court will overturn it.
However this could be a classic repeat of the mythical Andrew Jackson quote, "they've made their decision (supreme court), now let them enforce it"
Forcing federal law enforcement into a standoff with state law enforcement and national guard to enforce an action that is not illegal, in order to keep the border open in direct and blatant violation of Section 4, Clause 4, by a sitting president is textbook definition of treason, dereliction of duty and outright violation of the oath of office.
The constitution allows them to protect themselves when the federal government fails to do so.
It's clear given the Supremes decision to allow Texas to continue until the appeals court hears the case, that if texas loses the appeals court, the supreme court will overturn it.
However this could be a classic repeat of the mythical Andrew Jackson quote, "they've made their decision (supreme court), now let them enforce it"
Forcing federal law enforcement into a standoff with state law enforcement and national guard to enforce an action that is not illegal, in order to keep the border open in direct and blatant violation of Section 4, Clause 4, by a sitting president is textbook definition of treason, dereliction of duty and outright violation of the oath of office.
If Elon has proof of this, the FBI official that green lit this and the perpetrator are subject to criminal penalties for the willful and unlawful destruction, removal, or private use of federal records, See 18 U.S.C. § 2071.