Anonymous ID: 45e2d1 March 21, 2024, 3:59 p.m. No.20603738   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3761

Anon soliciting feedback: anon has a fren who works at a large financial firm where it was recently decided that bots to complete manual repetitive tasks, that have been saving countless hours of labor time, making for a more cost effective and therefore lower pass down costs to clients, will no longer be permitted.

Fren said the reason given was that bots are "bandaid solution".

Anon has been pondering this and think the decision is not only irrational, but so irrational that anon cannot help but suspect that there is an unstated agenda behind this decision that is not being communicated, and that then leads to suspecting that the reason is unsavory and too cowardly to admit the truth.

Anon starts logically. The direct impact of eliminating automation is that it increases manual labor.

So then anon suspects that it must be known this is the case, no firm that large can not know this.

So then logically it must be the case that there is a conscious desire to want to increase manual labor time on the kinds of repetitive tasks that bots perform.

 

Anon is just going to throw this out there: Should I tell fren that it is possible, indeed likely, that the "bandaid" reason given is a lie, that the real reason is to increase headcount of manual labor jobs so that the firm can proudly and quite racistly declare that racist demographic hiring "quotas" are being met?

 

The real reason must be irrational and anti-client focused, there is no good economic reason NOT to utilize automated solutions for repetitive tasks.

 

Is anon off base? What are your thoughts? Should anon recommend fren quit from what sounds like a toxic racist work environment that is placing racist "anti-racist" practises above efficiency and giving client highest value?

Anonymous ID: 45e2d1 March 21, 2024, 4:17 p.m. No.20603844   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>20603761

Depends on the shareholder(s). Imagine an investment holdings company owned by racist woke "activists" owned 51% of fren's firm's publicly traded shares.

Or imagine firm is privately owned and not trading on an exchange.

Clients are still disadvantaged, and theyre almost certainly not being told that the firm they're giving their money to, are consciously trying to increase manual labor, and increase costs, used in the delivery of services they are paying for.

Abstracting from shareholders, is this not a vicious middle finger to the firm's clients who are to pay higher prices all so that the firm's managers can claim hey look how many workers we have who look like this, we're not racists while being racists.

Anonymous ID: 45e2d1 March 21, 2024, 4:53 p.m. No.20604066   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>20604010

The cult needs the false narrative of Jews being homogeneous ants with identical thoughts and values because that narrative is then needed to support their larger divisive narrative of 'pro' <-'anti' semitism.

Anonymous ID: 45e2d1 March 21, 2024, 5:45 p.m. No.20604397   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Q+ truths video of Pastor Robert Jeffress: "They want to put the right to kill children at the top of their agenda, and the reason is the wickedness of their hearts."

 

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/112136066044928528

Anonymous ID: 45e2d1 March 21, 2024, 6 p.m. No.20604471   🗄️.is 🔗kun

The human trafficking cult funds and deploys the narrative of 'woman's right to choose' solely and exclusively to activate liberals/media hysteria when their wicked desire to kill children is challenged.