>baker seeking offhand
You claimed my bake, only to seek handoff right after making your own bake?
Wtf?
>baker seeking offhand
You claimed my bake, only to seek handoff right after making your own bake?
Wtf?
>and bread got mad shit on
Bread always get mad shit on.
Just funny you and BO show up and
>fix the mess
that was clearly being handled just for you fix'n'dash and BO offering to track my email address so I could bake more conveniently.
>you wanna take the dough then?
Not unless I have to.
>(i'm down)
You were seeking handoff, right? So you'd be 'down' no matter which anon bakes, right?
>bread is bread
And fixed bread is fixed bread.
Have a good bake, and IRL. o7
>>20609520 (me)
Me. Fuck. didn't mean to do reddit spacing…
kek
Hi BO. This is anon.
As anon, I'm sceptical. Of everyone.
I like it here (among obvious other things) because I don't have to sign in or fiddle with accounts of any kind, sock-puppet or otherwise.
I would rather do 2 posts, than sign in for the convenience of doing it in 1.
While it is correct that I expressed frustration over the limitation it doesn't mean I would ever compromise one of the core reasons for being here for the sake of convenience.
Again thank you for your offer, but I respectfully decline.
Never said it wasn't an ebake… The title of the bake was "Missing bread is missing Edition".
>you used my offer to say it was made in order to track your email address. And to suggest I and baker #2 are in cahoots.
Correct.
>No idea who that baker is but doubt he would appreciate an accusation made wo/any sauce.
I didn't accuse him of anything. I suggested it as a possibility.
You I did accuse. And whether you're actively doing so or not, sharing my address (sock-puppet or otherwise) would expose me more than I am. Which is essentially what I meant.
>Best for bakers either to work together or at worst,
I don't follow your rules or suggestions. But now you know why I only bake when I have to.
>to just leave each other alone
You are using my pointing out a scenario I found 'funny' to say I was stating definitive accusations.
This is left tactics.
>When Baker #2 asked for handoff, none of your business why, IRL shit happens, we are all volunteers here.
Correct. Does that mean I am not allowed to ask questions, point out (perceived) inconsistencies and form opinions?
>How would a temporary email expose you, when posting on here wouldn't expose you?
I said more than I am.
1st. choice of adress (though it's only an issue if you don't think)
2nd. Seperate trackers, seperate servers, exposed to more networks.
3rd. Track anon activity by login, why have a login if not use it. At least when I'm baking right?
>The only reason for a login is so that you are able to put MORE text into one post.
>It's that simple.
You can keep telling me that. That doesn't mean I will start believing you.
I told I'm sceptical of everyone. That includes you.
Why are we even still discussing this? I told you 3 separate times now that I'm not interested. Why do I have to provide you a reason?
>But you think visiting this site is 100% safe?
>Why would you think that?
Never said it was…
>Is there any other way to transfer a password to you over other channels? I can't think of any.
Don't need the password… so why would I care?
>And you were the one who complained that it was too much for one post
And you are the one seeing that as a reason to keep pestering me about something that I told you multiple times that I didn't want…
Did I say "Hey BO, this post body is not long enough for me, do something"?
I made an offhand comment and you're the one not accepting a no.