Anonymous ID: 3a1703 March 22, 2024, 3:27 p.m. No.20609520   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9527 >>9539 >>9543 >>9545 >>9549

>>20609438

>>20609457

>and bread got mad shit on

Bread always get mad shit on.

 

Just funny you and BO show up and

>fix the mess

that was clearly being handled just for you fix'n'dash and BO offering to track my email address so I could bake more conveniently.

 

>you wanna take the dough then?

Not unless I have to.

>(i'm down)

You were seeking handoff, right? So you'd be 'down' no matter which anon bakes, right?

 

>>20609479

>bread is bread

And fixed bread is fixed bread.

 

Have a good bake, and IRL. o7

Anonymous ID: 3a1703 March 22, 2024, 3:37 p.m. No.20609581   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9588 >>9599 >>9687 >>9729

>>20609545

Hi BO. This is anon.

As anon, I'm sceptical. Of everyone.

I like it here (among obvious other things) because I don't have to sign in or fiddle with accounts of any kind, sock-puppet or otherwise.

I would rather do 2 posts, than sign in for the convenience of doing it in 1.

While it is correct that I expressed frustration over the limitation it doesn't mean I would ever compromise one of the core reasons for being here for the sake of convenience.

Again thank you for your offer, but I respectfully decline.

 

>>20609549

Never said it wasn't an ebake… The title of the bake was "Missing bread is missing Edition".

Anonymous ID: 3a1703 March 22, 2024, 4:01 p.m. No.20609741   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9750

>>20609687

>you used my offer to say it was made in order to track your email address. And to suggest I and baker #2 are in cahoots.

Correct.

>No idea who that baker is but doubt he would appreciate an accusation made wo/any sauce.

I didn't accuse him of anything. I suggested it as a possibility.

You I did accuse. And whether you're actively doing so or not, sharing my address (sock-puppet or otherwise) would expose me more than I am. Which is essentially what I meant.

>Best for bakers either to work together or at worst,

I don't follow your rules or suggestions. But now you know why I only bake when I have to.

>to just leave each other alone

You are using my pointing out a scenario I found 'funny' to say I was stating definitive accusations.

This is left tactics.

>When Baker #2 asked for handoff, none of your business why, IRL shit happens, we are all volunteers here.

Correct. Does that mean I am not allowed to ask questions, point out (perceived) inconsistencies and form opinions?

Anonymous ID: 3a1703 March 22, 2024, 4:11 p.m. No.20609797   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9840

>>20609771

>How would a temporary email expose you, when posting on here wouldn't expose you?

I said more than I am.

1st. choice of adress (though it's only an issue if you don't think)

2nd. Seperate trackers, seperate servers, exposed to more networks.

3rd. Track anon activity by login, why have a login if not use it. At least when I'm baking right?

Anonymous ID: 3a1703 March 22, 2024, 4:28 p.m. No.20609916   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>20609840

>The only reason for a login is so that you are able to put MORE text into one post.

>It's that simple.

You can keep telling me that. That doesn't mean I will start believing you.

I told I'm sceptical of everyone. That includes you.

Why are we even still discussing this? I told you 3 separate times now that I'm not interested. Why do I have to provide you a reason?

 

>But you think visiting this site is 100% safe?

>Why would you think that?

Never said it was…

>Is there any other way to transfer a password to you over other channels? I can't think of any.

Don't need the password… so why would I care?

>And you were the one who complained that it was too much for one post

And you are the one seeing that as a reason to keep pestering me about something that I told you multiple times that I didn't want…

Did I say "Hey BO, this post body is not long enough for me, do something"?

I made an offhand comment and you're the one not accepting a no.