Anonymous ID: 593b69 March 23, 2024, 5:05 p.m. No.20615616   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>20615563

>Can @ericswalwell do this on an official government account?

Maybe. It depends if rules apply to him.

 

DOJ says Trump's tweets are official presidential statements

https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/government_says_trumps_tweets_are_official_presidential_statements

 

Knight First Amendment Institute v. Trump, 928 F.3d 226 (2019)

The court ruled that the @realDonaldTrump Twitter account is "a presidential account as opposed to a personal account", and blocking people from it violates their rights to participate in a "designated public forum". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knight_First_Amendment_Institute_v._Trump#

Anonymous ID: 593b69 March 23, 2024, 5:17 p.m. No.20615671   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>20615630

>right now it is full on bollocks from the media and their talking heads.

Perhaps the rest of the world simply fail to appreciate the significance of royalty, Anon. But, apart from the recognition that another human being is ill, why does this matter? It is unfortunate. Why is it significant?

Anonymous ID: 593b69 March 23, 2024, 6:46 p.m. No.20616188   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7155

>>20616143

>Who was the foreign woman?

Memory holed. La oubliette:

Epstein case: Jane Doe 107 fights for anonymity

Jan 22, 2024

 

Epstein case: Jane Doe 107 faces Monday deadline in anonymity battle

Jane Doe 107 must prove that if name is released, it would cause her harm

Unknown if Doe 107 is an accuser or an associate

Lawyer: Doe 107 'lives in fear of her name being released'

https://www.newsnationnow.com/crime/epstein-case-jane-doe-107-deadline-anonymity-battle/

Anonymous ID: 593b69 March 23, 2024, 6:59 p.m. No.20616266   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>20616178

> pause.

>It had to be this way. And it's glorious. What a time to be alive.

https://qalerts.net/?q=show+them

10 post(s) found containing "show them".