Anonymous ID: e09b95 March 24, 2024, 8:36 a.m. No.20618637   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8692 >>8716

‘Unacceptable’: Republicans Attempt to Ban Chinese-Owned Tutoring Service from U.S. Military Families

Olivia Rondeau23 Mar 2024

 

Republican lawmakers are attempting to ban the use of a Chinese-owned tutoring company by U.S. military service members and their families to prevent information from being “exposed to the Chinese Communist Party.”

 

Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) unveiled theBan Chinese Communist Party Access to U.S. Military Students Acton Thursday, specifically targeting the service Tutor.com.

 

The online tutoring company, which offersservices to students in fourth grade through college, isowned by Primavera Capital Group, one of China’s leading investment firms.

 

The group has also notably invested in ByteDance, the Chinese Communist Party-backed company behind the social media appTikTok.

 

The Department of Defense (DOD) has had a contract with Tutor.com since 2022so military families can use it, reports Just the News. (We have the most treasonous DOD in our history)

 

“While providing educational services, Tutor.com collects personal data on users, such as location, internet protocol addresses, and contents of the tutoring sessions,” the new legislation states.

 

“There is no reason the Pentagon should be paying a Chinese-owned service that collects the data of our service members and their families,” Cotton said. “There are plenty of American companies that offer tutoring services and aren’t subject to the Chinese government.”

 

Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) is introducing “companion legislation” in the House, Cotton’s office said.

 

Stefanik said in a press release:

 

I am proud to join Senator Cotton in introducing legislationprohibiting the DoD from utilizing Communist Chinese-owned company Tutor.comto educate our service members and their families. We cannot allow Communist China to collect an arsenal of data on our service members and their families that can be weaponized against them, posing a grave and unnecessary threat to America’s national security.

 

The legislation follows a February 14 letterfrom Cotton to Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, urging him to end his department’s relationship with Tutor.com.

 

The company has denied the allegations of sharing information with the Chinese Communist Party.

 

“This legislation mistakenly assumes that private information of those who use our tutoring services could be transferred to China,” Tutor.com said in a statement to Fox News.

 

Tutor.com is a U.S. company, and U.S. student data stays in the U.S. Primavera does not have—and may not obtain—access to our IT systems, per a U.S. government national security review voluntarily initiated by both parties and conducted by CFIUS when the private equity firm acquired Tutor.com.

 

As required by the U.S. government, Tutor.com has a designated data security officer, who has been vetted and approved by the U.S. government, to continuously monitor and ensure compliance with data-protection measures. Tutor.com also has two independent directors on our board of directors—also required, vetted, and approved by the U.S. government—whose foremost duty is to ensure that personal data is appropriately safeguarded.

 

However, Cotton remains firm in his position that the contract between the DOD and Tutor.com is “unacceptable.”

 

(It’s not only collecting data, but what propaganda have they embedded in the training? This sounds pretty bad. See in the reviews bad english, bad tech, no shows etc.)

 

(https://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2024/03/23/unacceptable-republicans-attempt-to-ban-chinese-owned-tutoring-service-from-u-s-military-families/

 

Look at just some of the reviews, totally compedLeave it to the DOD to choose thissubpar and comped program to train our soldiers, families and their childrenoh and schools and universities use it too. Gee, it seems like everyone in gov and commerce in the USA want us controlled by CCP, even down to little children!

Anonymous ID: e09b95 March 24, 2024, 8:47 a.m. No.20618692   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8716

>>20618637. Reddit Revuew tutor.com

 

Some of my complaints about tutor.com, as a tutor

Minimum wage job that requires a Bachelor's Degree.

Unreliable hours, so most if not all of your hours worked are afterschool. Voice sessions are mandatory, and voice sessions will become mandatory in 2024

Lack of transparency in everything (pay, benefits, rules, etc.) is weaponized by the company so that tutors cannot and do not communicate effectively with each other to form a protective union

They purposely omit lots of information from the Tutor Resource Manual so that the employees cannot utilize them.

 

Every single tutor is paid just very slightly above their local minimum wage.

There is basically a 3 sentence note in the Tutor Resource Manual that only tells you to contact (email) HR if you want to learn about Paid Sick time and how to use them. As a consequence most tutors don't even know that they are entitled to Paid Sick Time, and thus never actually use them

You are required to "float" for at least 5 hours a week, but you don't get paid for those 5 floated hours if you don't receive a session request. So you are essentially being made to work for free

There is zero upward mobility in tutoring job - this is by design. The company does not want to increase tutor pay. Therefore, they will do anything they can to to prevent you from advancing in title

Micromanagement from every level of management is insane. They will nitpick your work to the highest degree, even if you have good session ratings and satisfied students. Just so they can prevent you from advancing to a higher tutor status. So they don't have to pay you a decent living wage

You will basically be out of work during the summer season and winter break

Their 5-star rating system is weaponized against the tutor. Instead of taking the average of every rating that students give, they only take the percentage of sessions rated a "5" from the overall ratings

 

So even though you may have an average rating of 4.75, if enough of the session ratings were a "4" instead of "5" then you will lose your monthly ratings incentive bonus. This punishes tutors who cater to younger students and older stressed-out students who like give out low ratings for no particular reason, even though they seemed to enjoy the session that they had with the tutor

Note that some of these complaints are a bit unreasonable, because of course they are a consequence of the nature of the job. I.e.,of course most if not all of your sessions will be during afterschool hours

 

(if you work for China you get paid like Chinese)

 

https://www.reddit.com/r/tutordotcom/comments/177c6cn/some_of_my_complaints_about_tutorcom_as_a_tutor/?rdt=56463