>>20622460

Can an anon chk my math?

"Within decade 65% will die & 25% will be damaged"

"within a decade there will be less than 7B on planet"

Currently 8b x 65% reduction is NOTHING anywhere near 7B aka 1B "loss".

also if only 10% "will not be hurt", then that 800m better start having moar sex?

>>20622492

>DEAGEL

Yea anon has read & researched.

Still have the odd Q, however in big piccy, guidestones was on the money, and here we are, a ball of rock, hurtling through space & time(?), with zero'ish persons. "WTF are (they) gonna do with a rock", is my Q