>Good Morning, Sunshine!
Mornin Frenzz
>https://twitter.com/CatTheGreat_/status/1772773989854642227
Interdasting
check out the dude in the background
https://www.dvidshub.net/video/916458/coast-guard-continues-investigate-hoax-distress-calls-near-baltimore-seeks-community-support-identify-callers-voice
Coast Guard continues to investigate hoax distress calls near Baltimore, seeks community support to identify caller’s voice
facebook sharing button
twitter sharing button
linkedin sharing button
pinterest sharing button
sharethis sharing button
Remaining Time -0:52
BALTIMORE, MD, UNITED STATES
03.20.2024
Video by Petty Officer 1st Class Matthew West
U.S. Coast Guard District 5
Subscribe 43
facebook sharing button
twitter sharing button
linkedin sharing button
sharethis sharing button
Cmdr. Roberto Concepcion, chief of response of Coast Guard Sector Maryland-National Capital Region, in Baltimore, requests the public’s assistance on March 20, 2024, to identify the individual responsible for more than a dozen false distress calls originating from the Baltimore area since Feb. 17,2024. Anyone with information or recognizes the caller’s voice is requested to call (410) 576-2555. (U.S. Coast Guard video.)
>check out the dude in the background
https://www.news.uscg.mil/Press-Releases/Article/3713180/videoaudio-release-coast-guard-continues-to-investigate-hoax-distress-calls-nea/
Press Release | March 20, 2024
VIDEO/AUDIO RELEASE: Coast Guard continues to investigate hoax distress calls near Baltimore, seeks community support to identify caller’s voice
Editor's Note: Click above images for Coast Guard public service announcement video and false distress call recording
BALTIMORE – The Coast Guard Investigative Service (CGIS) continues to investigate hoax calls Wednesday and is seeking the public’s assistance in identifying the individual responsible for making multiple false distress calls that are originating from the Baltimore area.
The series of falsified distress calls began on February 17. At least 16 hoax calls have been transmitted overVHF channel 16.
The calls are believed to haveoriginated from the Strawberry Point areain Baltimore and consist of an individual calling out for help with no location or description of their vessel or nature of distress.
If you have information regarding the above incidents, or recognize the voice in the audio clip, please contact the CGIS tip line at (410) 576-2555.
CGIS is offering $1,000 reward for information leading to the identification, arrest and/or prosecution of the hoax caller.
VHF Channel 16 is for hailing and distress only. Knowingly transmitting false distress calls is a federal crime under 18 U.S. Code § 1038 and can lead to criminal and civil penalties if found guilty. The misuse can be punishable by up to ten years in prison and up to $250,000 in fines, plus the cost of the search.
Deliberate misuse of distress calls compromises the Coast Guard’s mission of providing search and rescue assistance to the maritime community.
“Hoax calls such as these are no joking matter and have a direct impact on our search and rescue readiness,” said Cmdr. Roberto Concepcion, chief of response for Coast Guard Sector Maryland-National Capital Region. “Our crews and watchstanders may be distracted by these hoax calls, diverting their attention from potential, real emergencies elsewhere, putting people’s lives at risk.
-
USCG -
>Big Tech and Deep State Collaboration Against Americans Is Bigger Than Previously Known [VIDEO]
Google ordered to unmask certain YouTube users. Critics say it’s ‘terrifying’
Innovation
Avatar of Thomas Brewster By Thomas Brewster
Published on March 25, 2024
Federal investigators have ordered Google to provide information on all viewers of select YouTube videos, according to multiple court orders obtained by Forbes. Privacy experts from multiple civil rights groups told Forbes they think the orders are unconstitutional because they threaten to turn innocent YouTube viewers into criminal suspects.
multiple youtube app logos overlapping
The government orders show an “unconstitutional”overreach by the government, multiple privacy experts said.
AFP via Getty Images
In a just-unsealed case from Kentuckyreviewed by Forbes, undercover cops sought to identify the individual behind the online moniker “elonmuskwhm,” who they suspect of selling bitcoin for cash, potentially running afoul of money laundering laws and rules around unlicensed money transmitting.
In conversations with the user in early January,undercover agents sent links of YouTube tutorials for mapping via drones and augmented reality software, then asked Google for information on who had viewed the videos, which collectively have been watched over 30,000 times.
The court orders show the government telling Google to providethe names, addresses, telephone numbers and user activity for all Google account users who accessed the YouTube videos between January 1 and January 8, 2023.The government also wanted the IP addresses of non-Google account owners who viewed the videos. The cops argued, “There is reason to believe that these records would be relevant and material to an ongoing criminal investigation, including by providing identification information about the perpetrators.”
“No one should fear a knock at the door from police simply because of what the YouTube algorithm serves up.”
Albert Fox-Cahn, executive director at the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project
The court granted the order and Google was told to keep the request secret until it was unsealed earlier this week, when it was obtained by Forbes. The court records do not show whether or not Google provided data in the case.
In another example, involving an investigation in New Hampshire, the Portsmouth Police received a threat from an unknown male that an explosive had been placed in a trashcan in a public area. The order says that after the police searched the area, they learned they were being watched over a YouTube live stream camera associated with a local business. Federal investigators believe similar events have happened across the U.S., where bomb threats were made and cops watched via YouTube.
They asked Google to provide a list of accounts that“viewed and/or interacted with” eight YouTube live streams and the associated identifying information during specific timeframes. That included a video posted by Boston and Maine Live, which has 130,000 subscribers. Mike McCormack, who set up the company behind the account, IP Time Lapse, said he knew about the order, adding that they related “to swatting incidents directed at the camera views at that time.”
Again, it’s unclear whether Google provided the data.
“With all law enforcement demands, we have a rigorous process designed to protect the privacy and constitutional rights of our users while supporting the important work of law enforcement,” said Google spokesperson Matt Bryant. “We examine each demand for legal validity, consistent with developing case law, and we routinely push back against overbroad or otherwise inappropriate demands for user data, including objecting to some demands entirely.”
The Justice Department had not responded to requests for comment at the time of publication.
>Google ordered to unmask certain YouTube users. Critics say it’s ‘terrifying’
Privacy experts said the orders were unconstitutional because they threatened to undo protections in the 1st and 4th Amendments covering free speech and freedom from unreasonable searches. “This is the latest chapter in a disturbing trend where we see government agencies increasingly transforming search warrants into digital dragnets. It’s unconstitutional, it’s terrifying and it’s happening every day,” said Albert Fox-Cahn, executive director at the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project. “No one should fear a knock at the door from police simply because of what the YouTube algorithm serves up. I’m horrified that the courts are allowing this.”
He said the orders were “just as chilling” as geofence warrants, where Google has been ordered to provide data on all users in the vicinity of a crime. Google announced an update in December that will make it technically impossible for the tech giant to provide information in response to geofence orders. Prior to that, a California court had ruled that a geofence warrant covering several densely-populated areas in Los Angeles was unconstitutional, leading to hopes the courts would stop police seeking the data.
“What we watch online can reveal deeply sensitive information about us—our politics, our passions, our religious beliefs, and much more,” said John Davisson, senior counsel at the Electronic Privacy Information Center. “It’s fair to expect that law enforcement won’t have access to that information without probable cause. This order turns that assumption on its head.
This article was first published on forbes.com and all figures are in USD.
https://www.forbes.com.au/news/innovation/google-ordered-to-unmask-certain-youtube-users/
>Just noticed the 180 mirror on the clock is 2 days ahead of 6 year deltas. Yesterday was 3/26, the 180 delta was 3/28/2018. Interdasting.
2 2/29s
>good morning Ralph.
o7
kek
pepepickle.png
733
Q !UW.yye1fxo 02/11/2018 18:53:03 ID:
8chan/greatawakening: 86
United Airlines to Guantanamo Bay?
What airline check-in counter @ PVG [T2] is located @ [E]?
What was the location of[E][picposted other board]?
Why is this relevant?
Q