tyb
o7
thanks for your opine
you totally convinced this anon.
anon is off now and will never return to this place.
that was a worthwhile 6 years spent here doing everything.
Goodbye 8kun.
Anon is off due now forever due to random stupid faggot who actually thinks that anyone would give a fuck about his opine and what anon does with his own time.
o7
some peeps do not understand sarcasm.
you are on 8kun now.
the rest of the world don't mean sheeit png.
something about Lloyds of london.
They were the first bank to start buying up properties which were auctioned due to a law passed allowing them to rent them out.
What happened. those who lost their properties due to debts job losses, interest rises are now being bought by the banks and rented out to immigrants.
not even as homes, they are being rented out to serco who will pay them 5 years rent and cover all the costs which they get the money back from the government which is tax payer money.
see below,
--
https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/stop-lloyds-bank-buying-up-new-build-homes-for-rent-su
To: Housing Minister. The Rt Hon Robert Jenrick MP
STOP LLOYDS BANK BUYING UP NEW BUILD HOMES FOR RENT!
JT
Campaign created by
Lloyds Bank is entering the rental market by buying up new build housing thus depriving first time buyers the chance to buy and they will land up paying a rent at least twice as much as the mortgage.
A law should be introduced that:
-
No new home can be sold to the rental market, only to buyers who will make it their domicile.
-
Buy to Let should be restricted to properties that need some updating. That would ensure developers actually do some work to make their profit and give renters a decent home to live in and meet environmental standards.
-
More safe Shared Ownership schemes where people can buy a new build and can staircase their mortgage when they earn more be introduced and monitored by the government. Hello Homes in the East Midlands have a brilliant scheme: why not extend such a scheme nationwide
-
On help to buy schemes, if the prospective buyer can pay the high rental costs then they should be allowed a mortgage to match it. Remember it wasn't these young people who caused the banking crisis; it was the banks and they have the audacity to penalise hard working young people, most of whom are are on moderate incomes and paying off their student loans to add to their misery!
Why is this important?
First Time Buyers cannot get on the property ladder. Young people are forced with the prospect of having a lifetime of renting. Their rentals are often poor quality, particularly down the lower end and do not meet basic standards now required for helping the environment. High deposits and a high income to get even the basic of homes is now out of reach of most young people. They are paying rents which are much higher than what they would pay on a mortgage. Now Lloyds Bank is entering the rental market by buying up new build housing thus depriving first time buyers the chance to buy and they will land up paying a rent at least twice as much as the mortgage.
Prospective homebuyers do support this. You are paying a high price to line other peoples' pockets with your rent and no prospect to buy. Parents - you want to see your children settled in their own home. We don't all have a money tree as the government likes to think - the bank of Mum and Dad (you're busy saving for your retirement and many of you will be still paying a mortgage!) All of us want first time buyers to have a realistic chance of owning their own home. It's good for them and good for the country - Buy to let has got out of control. Rental homes should not be a source of income for big business especially those like banks who should be helping people to get a mortgage not depriving them of one!
I'm a much older person who got my own home on a low deposit, and the mortgage was given much more easily. Today, house prices have risen much higher than wages and will be made worse by big banks and others who see this as a source to boost their funds. I want young people to be able to buy a home more easily.
Read more on Lloyd's plans to move into the UK rental market:
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2021/aug/19/lloyds-plans-big-move-into-uk-rental-market-with-50000-homes
https://www.ft.com/content/0f4f74dc-7e32-448d-9eb0-9fb264a3c8c7
https://www.independent.co.uk/business/lloyds-bank-aims-to-be-uk-s-biggest-private-landlord-by-2025-b1905081.html
end
Good advice.
ideologically 1984
actually on the Gregorian calendar 2024
hijir calendar 622 ce
-
Summariser
The Islamic calendar, also known as the Hijri calendar, is a lunar calendar consisting of 12 lunar months in a year of 354 or 355 days. It is used to determine the proper days of Islamic holidays and rituals, such as the annual fasting and the annual season for the great pilgrimage. The calendar enumerates the Hijri era, whose epoch was established as the Islamic New Year in 622 CE. During that year, Muhammad and his followers migrated from Mecca to Medina and established the first Muslim community (ummah), an event commemorated as the Hijrah. In the West, dates in this era are usually denoted AH (Latin: Anno Hegirae, lit. 'In the year of the Hijrah'). In Muslim countries, it is also sometimes denoted as H from its Arabic form. In English, years prior to the Hijra are denoted as BH ("Before the Hijra").0
ANON OPINE AFTER 48 HOURS WAIT PROTOCOL
it was the first thing anon stated after looking at the video. Including taking into account the 2 Qdrops on Chips.
https://operationq.pub/?q=chips
the black smoke is something anon could not understand as it was seen on the video before it hit the bridge.
if anon had to guess, it was a number of things.
1) hacked via the chips
2) Distraction with smoke, could have been a distraction
3) power came on and off before hitting the bridge could have been to use the rudder to change direction.
A ship that size once it changes direction, lose of control and distraction with sabatage would be possible to make the ship look like it lost control while it was actually co-ordinated to cause maximum damage.
There is no way that bridge would be able to withstand the impact of such a large and heavy impact.
The question is who carried out the attack.
1) those on board
2) Cypber attack (state attack)
obvious signs point to clown involvement.