Dr. Eastman Explains The Establishment’s Attack On Him For Questioning 2020 Election’s LegitimacyThis is so unfair.
16.27
https://rumble.com/embed/v4jhhkc/?pub=4
Dr. Eastman Explains The Establishment’s Attack On Him For Questioning 2020 Election’s LegitimacyThis is so unfair.
16.27
https://rumble.com/embed/v4jhhkc/?pub=4
this is hideous what the judge did in his trial, she lied about many things
must listento how much all courts are so corrupt. the courts do not even use the letter of the law, and if it's brought up in rebuttal they punish the defendant more
If anyone wants to donate to Dr. John Eastman to fight this illegal disbarment in CA, other states will follow suit
givesendgo/Eastman
he would appreciate any donations, him and his wife love reading the prayers sent to them.
This is one reason I like Dr. Eastman so much:(A lot of WIKI bias)
Dr. John Eastman
Kamala Harris citizenship op-ed
In August 2020, Newsweek published an op-ed by Eastman questioning 2020 vice presidential candidate Kamala Harris's eligibility for the office. He asserted she could not be a U.S. citizen by birth despite being born in Oakland, California, if neither of her parents was a permanent resident at the time of her birth. Eastman said that she could have subsequently obtained citizenship derived from the naturalization of her parents if one of them had become a citizen prior to her 16th birthday in 1980, which would have allowed Harris to fulfill the nine-year citizenship requirement necessary to become a senator.[57]
All prominent legal scholars disagreed with Eastman's position, and many compared it to the birtherism theory against President Barack Obama. Newsweek defended the column, while acknowledging that they were "horrified that this op-ed gave rise to a wave of vile Birtherism directed at Senator Harris". They stated there was no connection between the op-ed and the birther movement. Rather, the op-ed focused on the "long-standing, somewhat arcane legal debate about the precise meaning of the phrase 'subject to the jurisdiction thereof' in the Citizenship Clause of the 14th Amendment", also known as the jus sanguinis or jus soli debate.[58] However, Axios noted that other constitutional scholars do not accept Eastman's view, labeling it "baseless". Axios also criticized Eastman for dismissing the eligibility concerns of 2016 presidential candidate Ted Cruz, born in Calgary, Canada, in a 2016 National Review op-ed, claiming they were "silly".[59]
Erwin Chemerinsky, the dean of Berkeley Law School, told the BBC, "Under section 1 of the 14th Amendment, anyone born in the United States is a United States citizen. The Supreme Court has held this since the 1890s. Kamala Harris was born in the United States."[60] Harvard Professor Laurence Tribe was similarly dismissive, telling The New York Times "I hadn’t wanted to comment on [Eastman’s idea] because it's such an idiotic theory. There is nothing to it."[61] One day after publishing Eastman's op-ed, Newsweek published an opinion piece by legal scholar Eugene Volokh, titled "Yes, Kamala Harris is Eligible to be Vice President", in which Volokh argues that Harris is a "natural-born citizen" under the U.S. Constitution and is therefore eligible to be vice president.[62] Lorelei Laird, in an Above The Law article, pointed out that Eastman was arguing that Harris was not even a U.S. citizen.[63]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Eastman
Dr. John Eastman is the former Henry Salvatori Professor of Law & Community Service and former Dean at Chapman University's Dale E. Fowler School of Law, where he had been a member of the faculty since 1999, specializing in Constitutional Law, Legal History, and Property. He is a founding director of the Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, a public interest law firm affiliated with the Claremont Institute that he founded in 1999. He has a Ph.D. in Government from the Claremont Graduate School and a J.D. from the University of Chicago Law School, and a B.A. in Politics and Economics from the University of Dallas. He serves as the Chairman of the Board of the National Organization for Marriage.
Prior to joining the Chapman law faculty, Dr. Eastman served as a law clerk to the Honorable Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice, Supreme Court of the United States, and to the Honorable J. Michael Luttig, Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and practiced law with the national law firm of Kirkland & Ellis.
AZ-8 Candidate Abe Hamadeh On Arizona Corruption: “Everyone Knows We Got A Very Compromised System”
5:49
https://rumble.com/embed/v4jhjee/?pub=4
Stephen Richer is behind this
Mike Davis: President Trump Should Create “Criminal Probe” Into Democrats’ Lawfare Attacks. This attack on John Eastman is outrageousMUST LISTEN
11:23
https://rumble.com/embed/v4jhial/?pub=4
Kari Lake Explains AZ Dems’ Latest Defamation Lawfare Attack To Distract Her From The Campaign
10:53
https://rumble.com/embed/v4jhkew/?pub=4
(Yes the black man is Turner that lied about the budget).
Houston Mayor John Whitmire says city is 'broke' after decades of overspending that has stopped them from being able to pay firefighters
• Mayor John Whitmire proposing a 5% cut across the board, except for fire and police departments
• Tax hikes and increased fees for parking and city services are likely
28 March 2024
The Mayor of Houston says the city is 'broke' after overspending for decades.Democrat John Whitmire, who was elected in December, gave the bleak warning at a City Hill meeting this week where he proposed a five percent cut across all city spending to alleviate the cash-flow problem.
'I think we can all agree that we're broke,' Whitmire said, before proposing the planned cuts. 'This gives us a chance to discuss the financial picture of this City. It is broken! It was broken when I got here, ' he said.
America's fourth largest city is spending more money than it's taking in, leaving it with a $160 million deficit, according to FOX 26 Houston. 'We are broke!' Houston Mayor John Whitmire, who took office in January, issued the warning this week at City Hall. Experts say the problem has existed for years, butCOVID handouts from the federal government helped mask them.
'COVID really silenced the conversation because we got so much money from the federal government that we were able to make our budgets work, but really, this problem started 20 years ago, almost a quarter of a century ago, with the pension funds,' John Diamond, Center for Public Finance Director at Rice University, told KTRK.
Former Mayor Sylvester Turner, who just left office in January and presided during the pandemic,falsely claimed he was leaving the city with $420 million surplus. 'The budget surplus is largely thanks to $1 billion in federal recovery funds Houston received during the pandemic, which Turner has mostly used to cover city expenses while driving up its reserve account,' wrote the Houston Chronicle.
During his time in office,Turnerwho could not run again due to term limits,was criticized by former Mayor Annise Parker, financial groups and even the city comptroller for his handling of public funds.
“Let me just say, the sky is not falling,' Turner told the local paper last year.
Houston's cash-flow problem is so severe some firefighters are still waiting to be made whole on pensions and backpay. A 5% across the board cut in city services has been proposed, but it will not impact fire and police service
But local critics insist Turner wasn't telling the truth.'This has been obvious to anyone following the city's finances for well over a decade,' Columnist and businessman Bill King told the local Fox station. 'The you-know-what would have hit the fan in the last administration had it not been for this incredible influx of federal dollars.'
A tax hike through a bond is expected in November. 'That's very likely what we're looking at, going to the voters this November and saying, "Here's the plan, here's what it's going to cost, and we're asking you to chip in,"' City Controller Chris Hollins said.
The city has been struggling to make firefighters whole, from meeting its contractual obligation to their pension, to paying backpay and wage hikes that have been promised years ago.
Whitmire's plan to settle with the first responders will cost taxpayers $650 million for over the next five years. 'I don't like a five percent cut now, but you have to make tough decisions, and folks put me in this position to make tough decisions, and I'm going to do my job,' Whitmire stated.
The city also gave away some of its revenue to the public transit system in the 70s. 'They spent $3 billion on light rail system that is performing horribly,' King explained. H-town's money problems come at a time when the rest of the Lone Star State is swimming in cash.
If population trends hold, Houston would replace Los Angeles as the second largest city in the US.
Despite all the newcomers, local leaders haven't been able to cash in on the new arrivals, like other cities and town. Dallas and surrounding suburban cities are expected to be home to nearly 34 million people by the turn of the century– making it the largest city in the nation
Critics say the city should not default to taxing residents when they could raise the money but cutting the fat inside city hall and selling an expensive art collection owned by the city.
'The first thing we need to do is find where the money is first as opposed to the typical liberal answer to every problem: raise taxes on the people,' conservative political analyst Gary Polland suggested.
One idea is charge for services like trash collection, which are currently free.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/texas/article-13245311/Houston-Mayor-John-Whitmire-says-city-broke-decades-overspending-stopped-able-pay-firefighters.html
That was a lot of SS and police, there were 12 SUV's and an ambulance before and after him. The roads in that area are really skinny and a lot of traffic, 100s and 100s of people standing out in the rain to and give respects to the family and see Trump
Trump shows up at 1:46:45 in the video, I was hoping it would be exactly at 1:47:00. KEK