AS SOON AS I STARTED PUSHING THIS BIG LEAGUE POLI ARTICLE, THE GAY PORN SHILLS CAME OUT

Not to mention, every one of my posts were attacked by divisionshills and total homofaggots. Baker, thx for including in the notables.

Seriously anons, this Big League Politics article needs revisited. I looked into the media outlet and they certainly seem to be on /ourside/… just review their headlines at bigleaguepolitics.com

This Q anon article was written to glorify our movement and red pill normies. It gives us tons of credibility, paints us in a great light, and should be considered as a excellent example of disinfo being nec.

This was written for normies. It gives 8chan cred without sending them directly to our board. It makes us all look like fucking super heroes too.

Wake up anons. This article makes us Rock Stars and helps support the legitimacy of the movement. They actually call us brave revolutionaries. What fucking article has said any such thing so far?

THIS ARTICLE SHOULD BE ON GLOBAL NOTABLES

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/who-is-q-we-interviewed-the-anons-themselves-to-get-to-the-heart-of-the-mystery/

THX FOR THE BREAD BAKER

>>2065099

See notables. Anons discovered big league politics article was written by /our guys/ to help btfo of (((them)))

>>2065130

>>2065131

>>2065138

>>2065162

I can tell u fags aren’t mrketing gurus. This article calls us brave revolutionaries and fully legitimizes our cause. It’s clearly written by people on ourside.

We finally get a first fluff piece about Q and u faggots disregard it cus it doesn’t post the qresearch link and uses normie terms? Expand ur thinking anons.

>>2065201

Fuck off faggot. U can search through and see 3-4 anons agreeing with it. Not sure why anyone would attack the first article that paints us as rock stars? U retarded or just glowing?

>>2065235

Yeah me and my coworkers pushing an article that says Q anons are brave revolutionaries and makes us look like heroes. Way to use your brain there weetodd.

What shill in his right mind would push this article? This is a red pill in a link for normies that gives instant credibility to the Q anon stories.

This is what we need to fight the "Q is a larp" bullshit that shills like you try pushing. Now go KYS

>>2065232

Search that dude's (ca8aa9) posts and you can tell he's a shill.

>>2065185

Is that why all your posts are attacking an article that paints Q anon movement in a great light? STFU already. Your glowing is hurting mine eyes.

>>2065177

Yeah cus famefags post as anonymous on anonymous boards you dumbfuck.

Be gone already shill.

>>2065202

Take a few puffs than reread the article from the viewpoint of a normie… and it becomes clear.

>>2065312

>>2065321

Holy shit you shills are retarded. It's called plausible deniability you morons. Wake the fuck up here.

>>2065218

Thanks anon… i'm catching a lot of flack on this. Chewing up slices cus I'm fending off the fucking shill attacks…

first fucking fluff piece we get as the Q movement and for some reason, (((anons))) are pissing all over it.

We should know how to read between the lines by now. This shit isn't rocket science.

>>2065184

Exactly anon! Look at the Id's of who is attacking it… it's mostly one faggot (ca8aa9) - CommandF his posts, he's without a doubt a shill.

The shills don't get it. All they do is legitimify something when they over react like this. It's amusing.

>>2065155

Agreed anon. Look how many shillfaggots attacked your positive response to it. One just needs to search their ID's out and see they are shills posting like pelican clown glow faggots do.

>>2065398

^^^^ THIS

>>2065394

>reeks of setup

Is it asking for your CC or monthly fucking payments? WTF U talking about?

>insider bullshit

That's what this entire fucking movement is bout. If we could rely on our MSM for all the intel, we wouldn't need inside outlets like Q

You don't even make any fucking sense. Try harder. This time, try logic.

>>2065342

Turn people away? How the fuck would that article turn people away?

Other than the Tablet Mag article, that's the only media outlet that's even had the balls to give the credit to 8chan.

That article paints us in a positive view and only a glowing pelican clown mega faggot would disapprove of it, let alone attack it.

Ahem.

>>2065488

Fuck anon… thx for that… I was considering giving up too cus I feel bad for eating so many slices of bread but this shit is incredible. Haven't taken shill flack like this since the week I spent on GLP back in '15. F'n A…. but thx for noticing. I'm going to multi stack replies so I don't chew up so much bread.

>>2065493

You're not even the anon that I was replying to…. quit larping as an anon reply when your ID gives you away faggot… trying to make it seem like there's a consensus that the Big League Poli Article is bad news…. it's the best thing that's been printed for the Q movement today.

>>2065491

>>2065472

Yo faggot, why do you keep using my ID in your shilly posts… you giving commands to your glowing faggot friends attack my posts?

BV, BO - Run this ID's hash… look at his post history. He's giving faggot commands to tag team my posts. I'm fending off shills here anons.

>>2065450

Dude, the article admits that Trump is in on the Q movement without doxxing Q…. WTF man. Read between the lines much?

We don't doxx Q here.

>>2065417

e74a2b is classic example of division shill I'm facing now.

Hey you fucking Shill, you gave yourself away whe you said it's the AM shift… this is the nightcrew you dumb fuck but you're in Armenia or Jerusalem so it's probably morning time there, you're right. You JIDF faggots are slipping.>e74a2b

>>2065623

>further propaganda against 8chan

They don't even talk about 8chan. And have you know big league politics to be compromised in any way like Corsi and AJ so obviously are?

I just see this as an article that will more closely define the hollywood version of our Q anon movement in 5-10 years from now. It def glorifies us and I don't think that can be argued.

>>2065506

In what way is that article a hit piece? That's dumb af. Are you being sarcastic?

>>2065665

What proofs here did that article contradict? That doesn't even make sense.

What snopes, Nytimes, newsweek, and washpost do is contradict our proofs… that article glorified our movement anon. Come on man.

>>2065693

Did you not read the article?? You saying it didn't glorify our movement? Paint us in a good light?

wtf is going on here anons? Are we not reading the same article? GTFO faggot.

>>2065104

Have a (You) because you deserve it. (((they're))) gay porn shilling at untold heights right now.

>>2065414

Yes, they don't want us to recognize our first hand gifted fluff piece by a somewhat major media outlet…. the one that glorifies our movement.