Is that where the video of the ship hitting the bridge was taken?
When your only tool is a hammer, every problem begins to look like a nail.
"Nail him, Sarge! Nail his ass to the Cross."
>The Keystone is a masonic emblem and they act as foreign agents for the NWO
The (Sherriff's Badge) is a masonic emblem
The (Pentagon) is a masonic emblem
The (Rainbow) is a masonic emblem
The…
>you need to ask yourself if you have a mental illness
Those doctors were supplied their rhetorical ammo by the drug salesmen, not by an ounce or their "Medical Education".
"The FDA agreed with our research at Purdue Pharma that showed that Oxycontin is basically non-addictive…"
Why are District Courts free to disregard the Black Letter Law of the Constitution knowing most defendants don't have enough money to afford an Appellate Attorney, because "Constitutional Issues" are only decided upon Appeal?
Maybe after the Bailiff says, "All rise…," the Judge could lead the Courtroom in a recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag?
All the "Courts" in the US, are IN THE US, and only exist as a product of the US Constitution.
Unconstitutional laws allow unconstitutional judges to issue unconstitutional court orders that unconstitutionally infringe on the rights of the people. Per Marbury v. Madison, the whole production can be ignored as Null and Void.
"The Honorable XYZ" is an unconstitutional honorific Title of Nobility, forbidden by the US Constitution.
Calling judges ‘Your Honor’ is un-American
A punishment for not being deferential enough has no place in a democratic society
"The term “Your Honor” originated in feudal times as an honorific (no pun intended) for the titled nobility. It became recognized cultural practice to refer to judges as “Your Honor” in the West in the 18th and 19th centuries. This was the time period when we were busy ridding ourselves of the nonsense that is ‘nobility’ (some of us more than others, coughs Britain coughs). And with the number of aristocrats dwindling, the term “Your Honor” began to find more use in reference to judges.
The fact the term originated as a title for nobles should be cause enough for us in the U.S. to drop it; notions of titles and nobility are in complete opposition to our founding principles. The term is closer in spirit to the British monarchic traditions of the sovereign speaking first in all conversations and walking ahead of others when travelling on foot than it is to any of our liberal democratic traditions. We fought a war of independence to be free from the monarchy, not to implement a bastardized version of it in our own country."
https://dailycollegian.com/2023/10/calling-judges-your-honor-is-un-american/
>Cranch
Nominative Reporters
When citing Supreme Court cases from 1790-1874 it is appropriate to cite to the individual reporter from whom the case originated. For example, Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803). Cranch refers to the nominative reporter put together by William Cranch from 1801-1815.Jul 14, 2022
Case Law: Supreme Court Reporters - Dulaney-Browne Library
Dulaney-Browne Library
https://libguides.okcu.edu
(Apparently the meme has an error. Should be 1 Cranch, not 2 Cranch.)
The Greek Democracy…