>>20662490 PB
It was suggested last week that the N in NWO might be Neofeudalism.
I haven't done a proper dig but it might be worth a look.
Ambivalent. Libby is gone, Charlie is fading, Long live King Willy but; Willy make it?
Neofeudalist also encompasses Nazi and a bunch of the Weffers' agenda, from what I've been able to scratch together. I'm finding it a bit of a challenge to get a clear idea of neofudalisim.
Hence Neofeudalism, of which Nazi is alleged to be a subgroup. That's why I have been trying to find a clear description of what it is. It seems to be a true ism as in nebulous and ill-defined.
The simplistic single word "nuclear" has even less relevance than the word nazi. The Q post was deliberately unclear so as to promote deeper investigation.
About 7 seconds with a monkey!
Ok. Explain clearly, the relevance of Nuclear World Order then!
(You) can't because it simply makes no sense.
What is represented by the Nuclear World Order? Nuclear doesn't define any particular controlling power. Many countries that have conflicting opinions and directions are also have nuclear deterrents. It is simply too ambiguous to be correct. Nuclear is also a subset of Neofudalisim, as is Nazi. I still am not convinced that this is the correct definition but, I am pretty convinced that the simple word Nuclear is incorrect; despite what you have interpreted as a clear message from DJT.
You don't seem to comprehend that I am not trying to fit anything to my understanding!. I'm trying to understand, with reference to Q, What the best fit could be.
I'm not willing to be fed something that fits a preconceived belief system, even if it has been misinterpreted from a Trump statement. I will keep searching until a most likely, best fit, solution can be found.
So; no, (You) are not reading me correctly.