Anonymous ID: 0e4fc8 April 3, 2024, 7:18 a.m. No.20671607   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>20671596

Whenever a one post comes out of the woodwork to try and create a scene over a fucking cartoon frog, that's pretty good indication of how choleric the shills are. Congratulations for playing yourself, stupid. I don't give a fuck if you filter me, I prefer that those with the moar delicate sensibilities do. Dipshit.

Anonymous ID: 0e4fc8 April 3, 2024, 7:37 a.m. No.20671673   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1720

>>20671656

>Attempting to create a false narrative that Q is doing secret comms through twats is the heart of the bullshit.

Yeah, attempting to tie the timestamps in Canadian MIL tweets to Q posts was extremely suspect. Reeked to me of them just throwing everything at the wall they can and see what sticks and then run with that. If future information is revealed that sheds a new light on the topic then I'll be the first to change my mind, but until then I have to go with it being muddying the waters.

Anonymous ID: 0e4fc8 April 3, 2024, 7:43 a.m. No.20671698   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1751

>>20671686

>3. Q was right when Q said, "future proves past;" and

I think a portion of that part is that Anons had to be here when those posts were made and what was happening in the news at the time that may or may not have provided an additional layer of context to those drops. It's why shills coming in late to the game go over the Q drops and try creating rules out of statements and use Alinskyisms to try and make people "live up to their own rules" that were never rules in the first place, for an a bad example. There is definitely something to being here when the drops were made, can't quite put my finger on what though. Not smart enough to figure that one out, I guess.