>>20672506 LB
Kek truth really triggers some.
VD came along as I and others were digging on the vatican, and we were banned/deleted because BV at the time claimed we were VD.
It wasn't a mistake, it was by design. It's why VD started spamming. Anything vatican related is automatically called VD.
When you make an incorrect statement, someone corrects you with a FACT, you accuse them of selling pitchforks and torches, claim you don't care, and filtered, all for being told the truth….. that's triggered.
>>20672506 LB
>How much are you selling your pitchforks for? Got any torches for sale too? Who the fuck cares what a certain BV didn't like? I don't even give a fuck what you like. Filtered.
>What was the incorrect statement?
>>20672418 LB
>BO and the BVs have always been fair.
When I asked… "New here? Things were removed simply because certain BV didn't like it. What you're claiming is false."
You responded with >>20672506
>How much are you selling your pitchforks for? Got any torches for sale too? Who the fuck cares what a certain BV didn't like? I don't even give a fuck what you like. Filtered.
The FACT is, in the past things were deleted simply because the BV didn't like it. It happened a lot. It's the truth, and you were triggered by that truth.
>I wonder what angle the paid posters are currently working…
They're supporting censorship and projecting their own paid protesting on actual anons who call it out.
f32e23 would call Q a paid poster and filter him.