Anonymous ID: 25cd37 July 7, 2018, 1:27 a.m. No.2067477   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>7557

>>2067450

 

yupppp

in the meantime i'm spreading the shit out of forbidden article lol

 

idc if bo finds it cringey

idc if i'm being annoying

 

little kids are being raped as we speak and i'm supposed to give a fuck about the writing style of the first positive article about Q? HA.

Anonymous ID: 25cd37 July 7, 2018, 1:31 a.m. No.2067513   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>2067503

nah no thanks

 

i already rebutted that

we don't have any reporters to show "PR material to"

not to mention, anons are already hard at work at the Be Heard thread.

no new ideas in that post.

Anonymous ID: 25cd37 July 7, 2018, 1:49 a.m. No.2067618   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>7622 >>7632 >>7635

>>2067608

you're right we should all stop talking about the first positive article about Q

if it spreads on its own without our help then it spreads, who cares??

 

not like there are kids being raped, operatives losing their lives, politicians' families being harassed because most normies are ignorant to the movement!

 

let's just sit back and chill, man!

 

NAH NO THANKS

 

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/who-is-q-we-interviewed-the-anons-themselves-to-get-to-the-heart-of-the-mystery/

Anonymous ID: 25cd37 July 7, 2018, 1:55 a.m. No.2067650   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>7656 >>7659 >>7697

>>2067630

THANK YOU!! i knew he was /ourguy/ when i saw seth rich on the site

 

me and another anon were attacked for hours, even BO said article was cringey. it was so disheartening but i'm grateful we're getting more support in this bread

 

we just need more eyes on this article - shills don't stand a chance

 

thanks again, anon

Anonymous ID: 25cd37 July 7, 2018, 2:07 a.m. No.2067702   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

"PRAY AND BE HEARD" THE ARTICLE SAYS

"BE HEARD" Q SAYS

 

HERES ANOTHER LINK TO THE FORBIDDEN ARTICLE ALL THE SHILLS DONT WANT YOU TO READ

SEND IT TO YOUR GRANDMA

POST IT ON FACEBOOK

 

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/who-is-q-we-interviewed-the-anons-themselves-to-get-to-the-heart-of-the-mystery/

Anonymous ID: 25cd37 July 7, 2018, 2:25 a.m. No.2067764   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>7780 >>7851 >>7956

>>2067753

listen, i understand your point of view

but the article clearly states that there is an insider leaking intel from the white house

it just doesn't make that the focus

 

it's there. if you read the article

if you're not a shill, sorry for calling you one

i've been fending them off for hours

at this point in the game, we just need EXPOSURE

the details will sort themselves out later

this article is a great introduction

 

not to mention, we don't know who Q is - Q very well may include a group of hackers. Q is more than one person. for all we know, it could be ANYBODY.

Anonymous ID: 25cd37 July 7, 2018, 2:31 a.m. No.2067789   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>7896

>>2067766

no one's stopping you from digging

i'm responding to criticism

i will not shut up about this thing until it's widely accepted by anons the way the plan to save the world video was

this is huge news. you may have read it but not everyone else has, especially since bakers don't find it notable for some unknown reason.

our # 1 job is to spread the word about Q

 

sorry to say it but digging isn't raising awareness

digging isn't redpilling normies

we have MORE than enough information

and Q has EVERYTHING

all Q needs is the support of the people - which he doesn't have bc they don't know about us bc msm isn't covering us

so this takes priority over digging!!

anons need to accept this and spread it

that will not happen if the bread is filled with people saying "old news, let's move on"

if i recall, that's a hillary tactic "old news, keep it moving"

 

THE FIRST POSITIVE ARTICLE ABOUT Q IS A BIG DEAL. period.

Anonymous ID: 25cd37 July 7, 2018, 2:36 a.m. No.2067815   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>7828

>>2067743

 

the entire article was providing proof, anon

the entire article

except that one line of disinformation which is crucial to plausible deniability

 

like Q said, disinformation is sometimes necessary.

 

>>2067805

 

here's my reply.

where's your rebuttal.

Anonymous ID: 25cd37 July 7, 2018, 2:43 a.m. No.2067841   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>7846

>>2067828

who gives a fuck if they're a good writer.

our job is to spread awareness about Q

this article does exactly that. that is, if you spread it

instead of attacking the writing style.

and actually, i disagree. i think it was written beautifully. that was a quote from the person interviewed, not the writer. keep it moving.

Anonymous ID: 25cd37 July 7, 2018, 2:46 a.m. No.2067853   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>7866 >>7867

>>2067834

you're failing at your job dude

 

>>2067835

absolutely, anon

truth conquers all. and this article is 100% truth.

even what many consider false, they don't have proof of.

 

i have no proof that Q hasn't posted as bo, that Q team hasn't baked, etc

there is no evidence that anything in this article is false.

Anonymous ID: 25cd37 July 7, 2018, 2:51 a.m. No.2067879   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>7898 >>7915

>>2067866

of course i'm not connected to it lol

why would i be on here, wasting hours of my life if i were connected to it. i'd have more important things to do.

but since i don't, since my only role is to provide support on this board and to redpill as many normies as i can, i am here defending the article from shills and naysayers who are unable to see the bigger picture.

have a splendid day!! :)

 

who benefits from the mass spread of this article?

does anyone give a fuck about the messenger? or do they remember the message?

 

here you go, don't forget to send to grandma

 

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/who-is-q-we-interviewed-the-anons-themselves-to-get-to-the-heart-of-the-mystery/

Anonymous ID: 25cd37 July 7, 2018, 3:02 a.m. No.2067945   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>7983

>>2067926

my darling, i genuinely apologize for posting this many times. yes i do generally think highly of my own words and i don't think there's anything wrong with that. there is nothing wrong with confidence. that being said, it's (normally) not ok to spam and i recognize that. this instance is an exception because i and many anons whole heartedly believe in this article and its being shit on so extra determination is needed, especially to defend against actual shills who are being paid to make it seem like it's unpopular. thank you for the mirror. i see myself very clearly. i love you too anon.

Anonymous ID: 25cd37 July 7, 2018, 3:05 a.m. No.2067966   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>7976 >>7998 >>8006

>>2067931

oooh this is interesting, thank you

 

i just cannot see why anyone who genuinely supports Q would be against this article. it is highly pro-q, links to the video, the ben garrison comic, and puts the focus on WE THE PEOPLE, providing plausible deniability for Q

 

please present me with 1 logical reason why, in light of all that, this article is bad.

Anonymous ID: 25cd37 July 7, 2018, 3:08 a.m. No.2067985   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>2067976

we DO, anon

we have plenty of it

plenty of information the deep state thinks we should not have

and i am sure there are anons here, not just Q, who are actual hackers and shit

that is not incorrect!

Anonymous ID: 25cd37 July 7, 2018, 3:17 a.m. No.2068030   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>8088

>>2068024

nah, you're reaching if you're claiming it is written to portray it that way

it specifically states

 

The Q movement β€” predicated on the revelations of an apparent government insider named β€œQ”

Anonymous ID: 25cd37 July 7, 2018, 3:33 a.m. No.2068130   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>8137

>>2068120

lmao shut down other anons from talking about it? talk about it all you want. i am refuting the bullshit in my replies. with logic. and q posts. and quotes from the article.

 

meanwhile shills are crying about the writing style and the fact that the article says "we are q" which Q SAYS HIMSELF

Anonymous ID: 25cd37 July 7, 2018, 3:36 a.m. No.2068140   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

LETS STOP TALKING ABOUT THE FORBIDDEN ARTICLE

I AM DEFINITELY A CLOWN AND A SHILL CLOWNS DEFINITELY WANT YOU READING WORDS LIKE THIS

 

"What would happen if 2 million people stormed DC and citizen arrested all members of Senate? Would they get away with it? Would they be able to do it? Yes they could. Their head count is far larger than the criminal deep state, and that scares them, so they divide the people with hateful rhetoric so we turn on each other rather than organize and turn on them. Where we go one, we go all. I believe that if every human being in the USA stopped for a moment and realized in stillness what was really going on this vile hate and disdain they have for another would cease."

Anonymous ID: 25cd37 July 7, 2018, 3:39 a.m. No.2068159   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>8194

>>2068143

DUDE THESE ARE THE FIRST TWO SENTENCES OF THE ARTICLE. CAN YOU READ? BAKERS, BO, DO YOU SEE WHY WE HAVE SO MANY POSTS? BC OF SHIT LIKE THIS. THE ARTICLE DOES NOT SAY Q IS A LARP OR EVEN IMPLY THAT. FIRST TWO SENTENCES:

 

ShareTweet

As the β€œQ Anon” movement races into worldwide relevance, the White House press corps still refuses to address this growing phenomenon. The Q movement β€” predicated on the revelations of an apparent government insider named β€œQ” β€” seeks to expose the globalist criminal conspiracy that operates from within the confines of the U.S. federal government.

 

GOVERNMENT INSIDER NAMED Q

Anonymous ID: 25cd37 July 7, 2018, 3:44 a.m. No.2068188   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>8192 >>8213 >>8219

>>2068162

Q HAS NOT BEEN OVERSOLD

NOBODY KNOWS ABOUT Q

>>2068163

because i love this country. because i love humanity. because i know the impact that an article like this could have if it reached the masses. because no one in the press is talking about it. because i was really disappointed that the chant didn't work at the last rally. because i've been waiting for this moment my whole life, for the takedown of the cabal, for evil to be rid from this planet, whether or not i knew it at the time. because this moment in history has never happened before. because i can't fucking go to the white house and ask sarah sanders about Q myself. because i can't write an op-ed in the new york times. because i alone have no power. but we together have ALL of the power. because i believe in good and evil and i have my eye on the prize. the prize is 100th monkey. the prize is everyone and their mother knowing about Q and what we stand for. yes i'm fucking passionate. the least i can do is defend this article, this cause, Q, and by extension the millions of innocent people who are suffering at the hands of the cabal, whether directly or indirectly.

 

if you're more passionate about a cumming on a girl's face than that then you don't belong here.