Anonymous ID: f270e1 July 7, 2018, 1:28 a.m. No.2067488   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7722

>>2067450

>>2067447

BAM! Shill tactic 101: When you are shilling the hell out of the previous thread, about something even the BO says is cringy, make sure to get it into the next thread within the 1st few comments to make sure the new thread gets slid to hell. Happens EVERY time.

Anonymous ID: f270e1 July 7, 2018, 1:39 a.m. No.2067557   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7563

>>2067477

You are so cringy I bet you are happy thats what is happening to kids. Pathetic. I bet anything you get a thrill out of it. Its obvious since you are helping slide the thread & spread this bs article that will ONLY divide & puts a negative light on Q and everything we do here. SHAME ON YOU!!

Anonymous ID: f270e1 July 7, 2018, 1:52 a.m. No.2067633   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7644 >>7652

Ummmโ€ฆ.So they are all talking to themselves now in here. AND now saying the article was written by POTUS. HAHAHHA. Wow. Keep going guys! Please! This is awesome. Let any newfags coming in here see ho fucking retarded the article is & how shilly you all are being. or the one person hopping IPs is being. I wanted to go to bed but this is priceless. There are more posts in this thread with them talking to each other than actual info being worked on. hahaha. They completely took over this thread. Impressive.

Anonymous ID: f270e1 July 7, 2018, 2:01 a.m. No.2067672   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7710

>>2067644

It's mesmerizing. And they keep calling me a shill. hahaha. It's like watching the left do anything. Just let them run wild & they will eventually run themselves into the ground. no help required & they don't even see it happening. It's amusing.

Anonymous ID: f270e1 July 7, 2018, 2:05 a.m. No.2067689   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7787

>>2067566

Thank you Baker for not falling for the craziness! That's what I said previously, that the lies in that thing are NOT ok. There s ZERO reason to mislead people. We are all here trying to step out of that darkness. That D- essay just drags us back into it

Anonymous ID: f270e1 July 7, 2018, 2:18 a.m. No.2067741   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7754

>>2067677

It was written by a liar who is an illiterate douchebag tho. Who keeps posting here all night long you'd think he'd hear the criticisms & go back to write a better one. But nope. a hard headed sack of shit would rather force a hit piece. awesome. i love it

Anonymous ID: f270e1 July 7, 2018, 2:45 a.m. No.2067851   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7855 >>7857 >>7861 >>7867

>>2067764

Holy shit! I wasn't going to reply anymore but fuuuuck. You sound EXACTLY like the MSM hacks who try ot explain why they wrote an article that was filled with lies. "This very well COULD be true, we don't know for sure. so lets just SAY its true for the clicks! i mean "exposure" Woooo. PLEASE keep defending this article. You are doing a bang up job. I do hope they fire you tho. Your ego is embarrassing

Anonymous ID: f270e1 July 7, 2018, 2:52 a.m. No.2067888   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7912 >>7984

>>2067787

One more thing Baker, since the dude who wrote the article looks like he isn't stopping forcing this issue(I mean, this thread is majority him) when you do a handoff, can you inform the next Baker so he doesn't get pressured into anything? YOU ROCK

Anonymous ID: f270e1 July 7, 2018, 3:06 a.m. No.2067969   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>2067827

He apparently LOVES posting here & wants his article to be pushed as much at the Video was pushed so his article can be just as popular so he can make bank on it. He also said waaay up top that he doesnt care if Q says the article sucks that he will push the article or some gay shit. Hes a real gem that one. His twitter account is sad & people hating on the article too hahaaha. so its not just the people here.

Anonymous ID: f270e1 July 7, 2018, 3:10 a.m. No.2067994   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>2067834

Seriously WTF! He says something not true & then tells YOU to prove it's not true. How is this a writer?! That is how Liberal argue things! I guess no sleep for me because I cant stop laughing at this dude

Anonymous ID: f270e1 July 7, 2018, 3:23 a.m. No.2068072   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8089

>>2067855

In all seriousness, they should! A retraction would be even better. All they have to do is read all the replies from the writer(which we all know by now IS the PAtrick dude, on BOTH IDs that are well over 50 posts each) and they can see for themselves how delusional he is, how he lies in the article & DEFENDS the lies by saying no one can prove it. I never heard of this website until tonight because of this guy & let me tell you, I will NEVER see it as a real thing. If it posts shit like this with a straight face? Never can it be used as a source for anything now. Twitter people hate the article too, the few who read it. Bad publicity right here on this board and it was 100% caused by the creator of the article. for shame big league politics