TYB
KEK. And just like the MuhJoo spammers, if you don't agree with them and their opinion of their target, they accuse you of being their target. For example, disagree with their MuhJoo narrative, then they call you a Jew, or a rabbi, or some slur denigrating Jewish people. Disagree with their "famefag" narrative, and they accuse you of IP hopping and being the "famefag" they're targeting. There's a distinct connection between those two narratives and the tactics that are used. Same clowns, same tactics, just different targets. They didn't even come up with something new.
Why would I be butthurt by pointing out the tactics of the shills and the similarity between two different narratives they try cultivating? You smell of projection. It must be so frustrating for you clowns.
HAM radio spammer was the same one spamming chicks in bikinis fishing too. Same clown.
So you've moved on from accusing everyone that disagrees with you of being a famefag to being a sycophant for Judaism, huh? What's your home life like? Are you taking your frustrations out on your family unfairly? Do you wake up with a ball of stress in your chest from a night of sleeping restlessly? When was the last win you had?
>>20677903 (edit: meme spelling)
Ooops. Fixed.
They seem a little agitated today. Poor bastards.
That… is an eloquent and most apt comparison. Thank you for that, Anon. Never looked at it that way before. o7
>using the term 'muhXXX' as you do is basic
No, that's the term that developed all on its own here to refer to not just the poster of that narrative but the narrative itself as well. A double-meaning. AEI likes calling people basic and generic and formats posts like that as well when he's not fontfagging.
>there is no common narrative, nor is it just one person.
You never saw the half a decade of MuhJoo then? Never said it was just one person either. You're trying to create consensus by doubtfagging.
>and you playing 'ping pong' with them, bantering about them, just contributes to the effect.
And ignoring it is just giving them tacit approval to continue and amplify it if there's no pushback.
>please stop.
Filter then, and don't be a whiny bitchflap begging for someone to do what you want them to do.
So any instance of a rainbow means him now, huh? You're most likly the only one if you think of him when you see a rainbow. Filtered.
Jesus also argued a lot, pissed off a lot of power people with his arguments, and even took a whip to some. Trying to frame your argument without taking those facts into account just means to me you don't totally understand Jesus, and are trying to use half of the truth to frame your argument, which is in itself dishonest. Filtered for being a paid posting clown pushing a division narrative via religion. You smell of Parakeet.
I like jokes that are funny, or witty. So, no, I couldn't take your joke.
No, I never announced I was offended, I announced I thought you were stupid. There's a significant difference.
No, they're not. And I thought I filtered you. Gee, I wonder who has continually displayed plucky deflection while simultaneously trying to claim the high ground and trying to force consensus through. Last (You) you'll milk for your slide.
So Zelenskyy bought a former mansion from King Charles for $25 million, huh? That's an odd purchase for a leader in the middle of a war.
That was heartwarming.
And you hold up the same handful, every fucking time, as if that small sample size represents all of them and everyone should believe the entire MuhJoo narrative now because of your smoking gun, huh? Q said you were stupid, and you're just proving it by adhering to your NPC script. I guess I can't fault you for that, because for some being stupid isn't a choice. Filtered.
I've said what I need to say to the clowns today. Time for memes and tunes.