1/2
The term "blood libel". This one is interesting. While it is indeed true that there exists people in the world who have a "bloodline division" logical view against Jews as a whole group, Anon notices that it is also being used as an accusatory weapon that reveals the accuser's own "blood libel of others" beliefs, where the accuser sounds like they are the ones introducing blood libel themselves in labelling other people as allegedly being motivated by blood libel.
Anon also notices that the more certain voices insist that their bloodline is really not like the rest of humanity's, that their bodies and existence carry a unique set of attributes that justifies a SELF-DIVISION from the rest of humanity IN ANY WAY WHATSOEVER, Anon is seeing that as in itself a source of blood libel division and conflict. Contrary to such behavior being good and moral and justified to make sure bloodlline based group identity is held intact and "protected", "from annihilation by haters", and to ensure "self-determination"….Anon sees the accusations as a projection from the accusers and seeing their own views of humanity to be as such.
This Anon right here views every last person as belonging to one human race, everyone's blood is red, end of story, that any and all ideas of bloodline based division, FOR BOTH 'GOOD' AND 'BAD' REASONS, are ALL inherently flawed and wrong and bad, and when taken to extremes results in genocide.
Bolsheviks, Nazis, in Anon's opinion they are both derived from the same underlying philosophical view of a humanity divided by bloodline, in an alleged "hierarchy". A psychology of "I/We am/are different from you and the rest of humanity" is a view that leads invariably to: "therefore your interests are necessarily incompatible with mine/ours, unless you sacrifice your interests and bow and concede 100% to our interests, regardless of our actions, lest we falsely label you as the one sourcing the very blood libel I/we are actually introducing into the world".
Anon NEVER views ANYONE as higher or lower (under God) based on the characteristics of their bloodline. We're all human beings. Anon therefore knows with absolute certainty that should Anon, or anyone else who Anon sees the logic in other people's statements, get falsely accused of in any way shape or form as invoking "blood libel", Anon is in reality witnessing a source that is itself introducing a blood libel accusatory posturing against other people's bloodlines in a divisive destructive way, regardless of which "side" they are presenting themselves as "representing" in the hierarchy.
Who could possibly be against regarding ALL bloodline based division, 'good' and 'bad' excuses, as indeed both bad because they both result in denying the fact that we are all from one source and are therefore all united forever?
When Anon even just imagines dividing self from the rest of humanity based on Anon's bloodline, where Anon believes that self and a subset of other people are allegedly divided from the rest of humanity by bloodline, FOR ANY REASON, Anon cannot help but think Anon is making a serious error, that Anon would itself be a source of division and conflict in humanity, and would be ADDING to the existing division and conflict, not subtracting from it or being neutral to it or "merely trying to preserve the self-determination of Anon's group bloodline affiliation".