so is there really going to be a burnt offering (haulocaust) of a red heifer during the eclipse or is that just misinformation?
from Psalm 40:
"Holocausts or sin-offerings you sought not;"
let the Red Heifer live!
Also see Hebrews 10.
if so it will be ironic as the reading for Monday, the Feast of the Annunciation, includes Psalm 40 and Hebrews 10, as well as
Luke 1 26-38 where Gabriel appear to Mary and she says accepts the will of The Lord , the first person to accept Jesus into her life!
how ironic, a statement that is both true and false at the same time.
I suppose to be true we might need quotes around 'nothing'.
in one context it means one thing, in another context it means something else.
the same phrase used for two different purposes, can be true in one case and false in another, and there is no paradox.
sorry, it's not a paradox. It's an interesting example of how things need to be placed within their context, statements are needing context for meaning.
came from whole again?
what does that mean?
in what way is your posting eccentric?
you showed the busty girl, but it wasn't pornographic.
you showed a meme with Zelanski
you showed some woman with a pizza shirt (triangles)
accused someone of 'attacking' BO and BVs (with no link to it)
the post to which Iam responding, with a Pepe in Flag face and fireworks (patriotic)
and so what is the selfish part?
I agree. The term is used to mean a lot of different things.
what is this one interested in then?
there is no talking with toxic personas here.
no matter what you say to them they act all offended.
how can I supposed to know where to magically put in a comma?
I'm glad this one filtered me.
if it were my post I know what I meant to say. but if it's someone else's post I can't assume I know what they were meaning.
and if they made one mistake, maybe they made many.
sometimes a typo is obvious and the meaning is clear, so it seems. Or sometimes things can have multiple meanings, depending on context.
I figured the person was troubled and needed someone to listen.
instead it just wanted someone whose head it could bight off (allegorically).
alas.
if you hold out your hand in compassion, to lend a helping hand, someone like that might grab it and try to make you stumble into a ditch.
A good person offers to help anyway.
I'm not always such a good person like that.
I'm trying to be better.
and someone like that tries to train us to be callus and heartless.
but it won't work.
what is it for? a sin offering?
what sin was committed?
if they get baptized they can save the life of the animal.
but if they don't believe in Jesus Christ I suppose that's not an option for them.
It's rather sensible to believe, I feel, that killing an animal as a way to atone for sinning . . . is rather brutal.
and as it says in the 40th Psalm, the haulocaust as a sin offering isn't really asked for.
why do they think it's important to do this?
if the priests convert to Christianity they can be baptized and that will purify them . . . to rebuild that temple.
if you study the history of the term 'muh' you might get an idea what it meant originally.
there was 'muh Dick' with the prince.
there were 'muh N-word'.
muh meant 'my' with a kind of smug indifference of someone who has a superiority complex.
and the muh-Jew term was used to describe a particular odious type of poster who posted every single bread, for like 50 or more posts, odious and outragious slanders against Israel and Jewish people. the person was duped 'muh Jew shill' (it was a script , couldn't have just been a person).
and then anyone who posted about Jews was called that.
are they or are they not Jewish?
one hopes that they aren't because that would imply someone is doing to to muddy the breads and make these odious.
now the term really applies to anyone who spends too much time dwelling on those posts, and complaining about them, as well as those who post it because the whole dynamic of the hateful spam and the complainers about the hateful spam seems, at times, to just be a great big slide.
so the 'muh jew shill' is the one who posts the hate and also the one who demands that the hate posts be deleted.
get it?
I think the term is too ambiguous now to use it without being a lot more specific.
you are so wrong. I'm not defining it. I'm describing what I've noted.
you see what you want to see.
you seem to want conflict.
try someone else, I'm not taking the bait.
things evolve. As I said
I think the term is too ambiguous now to use it without being a lot more specific.
PS: that isn't copy paste, I just composed it.
yes, that's a good point.
like someone might say 'muh heartbreak' if someone was opining about loss of love . . .
so if an anon were writing about loss of love and it was sappy and silly and self-indulgent, another anon might have posted 'ya, thanks for your write up on 'muh heartache' kind of like saying 'did you really need to post all that?
but if you were talking about yourself, and you said 'ya, She left me, I was devastated. muh heartache.' that would be self-deprecating like saying 'ya, I had it, it is in the past, I'm over it now, and it's perhaps a bit embarrassing'
muh really is a useful term and the nuances of it must really vex the non English speakers.
some of them seem to want to nail down a meaning when it's meant to be expressive and it must be taken in context.
victory for the ukraine dicatatorship might seem to be that.
for ordinary citizens of Ukraine? Victory might be removing the dictatorship and restoring their elections.
what Alliance is that, anon?
what Alliance is that, anon?
many Ukrainians are already embedded in the west. Isn't one of them running for congress in Virginia? didn't they take their billions and buy up all kinds of property in Ohio?
and don't their drug mule guys drive trucks and mow down ex Marines and then get acquitted of murder?
So they are already here and thinking that they rule so what's your point?
I don't do that.
I don't have access to planes.
I'm not a 'player' like that.
The United States is a Vassal of the greater corruption and Ukrainian overlord types are higher on that pyramid's food chain than Americans of other descent.
it's a class based society.
Ukraine was always a place of slaves and overlords.
the ones who seem to rule there have very high opinions of themselves.