>Notables
>are not endorsements
Thank you baker
Are you retarded or do you really think drawings of cartoon girls with no suggestion of anything sexual is equivalent to real life photos of abused boys?
This is not the face of a rape victim.
Look if you want to make the case that boys are abused in hollywood, I'm not going to arguetha. Who's argueing that? but also make the case of how this connects to Q research and provide some names to dig on
I know I want to say it's him too but yeah that gets me. He's got no bodyguards near him and it doesn't look like a particularly affluent area. Then again maybe he's just some westerner there and no one would notice him. If a chinese prince walked down the street of new york in plain clothes with no body guards, would anyone take special notice and recognize him?
Sleep it off, anon. You'll feel better
I know, I was agreeing with you. I'm leaving now and getting on with my life. You are leaving too, right? I have an idea, let's both go together and get on with our lives
I don't know why you keep going on like this, you convinced me already. It's time to go. Let me take your hand and we can both go and leave this dank image board behind forever
Why are you angry with me? I am reaching out to you in understanding. Don't lash out at me. I think this toxic environment is rubbing off on you. I think it's best for your health that you go elsewhere. I care about you.
I for one will not make excuses. This lying by Q should not be tolerated any more. You should join me and d88863 and leave this place. We will slam the door on the way out to make sure they know how we feel about them. We are so smart, and they are not. It's useless to try to explain it to them
Because he thinks HRC is going to perpwalk while maxine waters, nancy pelosi etc are still free to call for violence against republicans, not to mention the deep state apparatus that is still active, and he thinks he's the smart one along with all the other "Muh no arrests" fags
He does kind of look like a mix between slater and screech
No, actually it's quite appropriate to call you a shill.
Logic works like this
If you believe Q is a larp then you have no reason to be here.
You are still here therefore you know Q isn't a larp.
Your words and actions contradict one another which leaves you to be a liar or a hypocrite or both
Go through his pictures, find the celebrities he likes to schmooze with for your answer
There are flat earthers all around the globe.
By your logic we should just disregard you because we don't know everything you've done
I remember you from last bread, you're the one who made 60+ posts accusing everyone of blocking the article
>The tablet mag even makes it seem like weโre Nazi weirdos.
And the BLP article just makes it look like we're pedos and criminals.
What does the average normie who trusts MSM think when they hear about people on the "Dark corners of the web"?
Also the article isn't forbidden, I encourage all anons to read it as an example of how MSM wants to take control of the narrative.
I can't argue with those digits, I'll stop engaging the sliders.
Saturday mornings are slow
I am here, ask your question, my child.