>>20685795

Tyb

>>20686312

>>20686341

>>20686350

are you

Q

?

>>20686367

could be the woman in blue….

look here

look there

watch out! behind Q

>>20686370

papa Q?

mebee

>>20686378

>>20686189

thank fuck, you're not a chick

nice watch

>>20686213

if youre steve jobs, imma gonna laugh

>>20686249

good news

>>20686350

so, you're suggesting Q is an actual person?

and that why Q was acquitted…

#101788 at 2021-10-17 23:43:54 (UTC+1)

QRB General #662: Waiting For The Glitch Sunday Afternoon Edition

what if Q is the first arrest?

Then the Alphabet becomes:

ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPRSTUVWXYZ until Q gets out.

Q was acQuitted

next door keks

#17470965 at 2022-08-31 14:48:51 (UTC+1)

Q Research General #21414: Day Shift Coming In Hot Edition

>>17470853

>>17470840

Q was acQuitted, they know who Q is.

#15331250 at 2022-01-08 09:32:01 (UTC+1)

Q Research General #19392: The World's Great Awakening Edition

>>15331248

Q was acQuitted

That is a HUGE victory

#14804368 at 2021-10-17 23:41:04 (UTC+1)

Q Research General #18726: Callsign ANON Edition

>>14804318

ANY ANON got the decode from cENTRO on Q was acQuitted?

#14804318 at 2021-10-17 23:29:07 (UTC+1)

Q Research General #18726: Callsign ANON Edition

>>14804231

Q was acQuitted

>>20686398

Q was acquitted

eclipse

>>20686448

but Q+ has a book and pen too

>>20686448

so these ones are Q's.

7 Compelling Reasons Why Ivermectin Is a ‘Powerful Drug’ for Fighting Cancer

Rick Alderson “was a dead man walking” and given 6 months to live. But then, he started ivermectin treatments and something surprising happened.

Published 5 mins ago on April 5, 2024By Vigilant Fox

Ivermectin is often recognized–2nd to penicillin–for having the greatest impact on human health. Its discovery even won the Nobel Prize.

It is safer than Tylenol and brought river blindness to the brink of extinction, but the propagandists told you it was a “dangerous horse dewormer.”

Well, it now turns out that ivermectin is not only an effective treatment for COVID-19, but it could also be a “powerful drug” for fighting cancer. Here are 7 reasons why.



Image via The Epoch Times.

1. Multiple Anti-Cancer Effects:

Ivermectin impacts at least nine well-defined cancer targets, according to Dr. Alfonso Dueñas-González, an oncologist and senior researcher. He states, “There are at least nine perfectly defined cancer targets affected by ivermectin.”

1. Enhances Effects of Chemotherapy and Radiation:

Ivermectin not only targets tumor stem cells and promotes cancer cell death but also “enhances the effects of chemo and radiation therapy.”

This broad impact on the immune system increases the offense against cancers, making it a versatile adjunct to conventional treatments.

1. Inhibits Cancer Cell Cycles:

The drug prevents the formation of new cancer cells by inhibiting cancer cell cycles and inducing mitochondrial stress, which leads to the killing of cancer cells. This mechanism is crucial for stopping the proliferation of cancerous cells.

1. Prevents Formation of New Blood Vessels Near Cancer Cells:

Ivermectin prevents cancer survival by inhibiting the formation of new blood vessels that transport energy and fuel to cancers. This action starves the cancer cells, hindering their growth and spread.

1. Synergizes with Immunotherapy:

Dr. Peter P. Lee, chair of immuno-oncology at the City of Hope, found that ivermectin could synergize with immune checkpoint inhibitor anti-PD1, enhancing the body’s immune response to fight cancer.

“What we’re learning is that ivermectin is going to be a very powerful drug in the context of really carefully developed immunotherapy combinations,” he said.

1. Targets Cancer Stem Cells:

Ivermectin preferentially targets cancer stem cells, which are a driver of cancer tumors and relapses. By focusing on these cells, ivermectin attacks the root of cancer’s resilience and ability to recur.

1. The Curious Case of Rick Alderson:

Mr. Alderson, a retired sawmill worker, “was a dead man walking”and given 6 months to live after his terminal colon cancer had metastasized and spread to his liver, where it had formed 25 distinct tumors.

After starting ivermectin, Rick Alderson’s carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, which are markers for tumor activity, dropped significantly from 1,498 ng/mL to 13.9 ng/mL in a matter of months.



Of the 25 tumors in Mr. Alderson’s liver, only three remained after his treatment with ivermectin and chemotherapy, indicating a substantial reduction in tumor burden.

Mr. Alderson lived for two more years beyond his initial six-month prognosis, which his wife attributes to the use of ivermectin alongside chemotherapy.

https://vigilantnews.com/post/7-compelling-reasons-why-ivermectin-is-a-powerful-drug-for-fighting-cancer/

71-Year-Old Grandma Convicted on All Charges by DC Jury After Praying in Capitol on Jan. 6

By Randy DeSoto, The Western Journal Apr. 5, 2024 8:00 pm355 Comments

A Washington, D.C., jury convicted Rebecca Lavrenz of Falcon, Colorado, known on social media as the “J6 Praying Grandma,” of four federal misdemeanor charges Thursday related to her participation in the Jan. 6, 2021, incursion of the U.S. Capitol.

The 71-year-old faces up to a year in prison and more than $200,000 in fines, the Colorado Springs Gazette reported.

According to federal court documents, Lavrenz’s crimes were entering and remaining in a restricted building or grounds, disorderly conduct in a restricted area, disorderly conduct in the Capitol Building, and parading, demonstrating or picketing in the Capitol.

Federal prosecutors said in a court filing that cellphone data and video footage showed Lavrenz entered the Capitol at approximately 2:43 p.m. on Jan. 6, 2021, about 90 minutes after the conclusion of then-President Donald Trump’s speech on the Ellipse.

She then walked to the Capitol Rotunda and exited the building at approximately 2:53 p.m.

So Lavrenz had been in the Capitol for about 10 minutes. The DOJ did not accuse her of engaging in violence or destroying any property.

The Biden DOJ wants to throw 70-year-old grandmother Rebecca Lavrenz in jail for a year and hit her with $210,000 in fines.

Her crime?

Praying in the Capitol for 10 minutes on January 6th.

Meanwhile illegal aliens not only go unpunished for their crimes, but are rewarded… pic.twitter.com/7d6uhaZCYg

— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) April 4, 2024

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/04/71-year-old-grandma-convicted-charges-dc-jury

>>20686468

If you're Q,

and you organized all this, with everyone else,

and went through hell to save the world

with utmost sincerity

Thank You

ps for makin muh timestamps special, and improbable

grins

>>20686474

you should be in bed, you have an election to win!

“Are You Kidding Me?” – Biden-Appointed Judge Rips DOJ For Flouting Hunter Biden-Related Subpoenas While Pointing Out Peter Navarro is in Prison For Same Defiance

A federal judge on Friday ripped DOJ prosecutors for ignoring Hunter Biden-related subpoenas while pointing out that Trump’s top advisor is in prison for defying a subpoena issued by House members.

In September former Trump advisor Dr. Peter Navarro, 74, was convicted of criminal contempt of Congress for refusing to comply with a subpoena in Liz Cheney’s January 6 investigation.

Navarro did not comply with the subpoena because he said Trump told him to assert executive privilege.

Hunter Biden blatantly defied a congressional subpoena and nothing happened to him. He is a free man while Navarro sits in prison.

US District Judge Ana Reyes, a Biden appointee, blasted Justice Department prosecutors for ignoring subpoenas issued to two DOJ lawyers in the tax division over their role in Hunter Biden’s federal investigation.

“There’s a person in jail right now because you all brought a criminal lawsuit against him because he did not appear for a House subpoena,” Judge Reyes said, referring to Peter Navarro. “And now you guys are flouting those subpoenas. … And you don’t have to show up?”

“I think it’s quite rich you guys pursue criminal investigations and put people in jail for not showing up,” but then direct current executive branch employees to take the same approach, judge Reyes said, according to Politico. “You all are making a bunch of arguments that you would never accept from any other litigant.”

Politico reported:

A federal judge tore into the Justice Department on Friday for blowing off Hunter Biden-related subpoenas issued in the impeachment probe of his father, President Joe Biden, pointing out that a former aide to Donald Trump is sitting in prison for similar defiance of Congress.

U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes, a Biden appointee on the federal District Court in Washington, spent nearly an hour accusing Justice Department attorneys of rank hypocrisy for instructing two other lawyers in the DOJ Tax Division not to comply with the House subpoenas.

Last month Dr. Peter Navarro reported to prison for his 4-month sentence. He is the first high-ranking Trump aide to be imprisoned by the Biden Regime.

A federal appeals court previously denied Navarro’s request to remain out of jail.

The three-judge panel – all Obama appointees – included Judges Patricia Millett, Cornelia Pillard and Robert Wilkins.

“[T]he argument presupposes that privilege has actually been invoked in this case in some manner by the President,” the judges wrote in a two-page order, according to Politico. “That did not happen here.”

US District Judge Amit Mehta, an Obama appointee, said Peter Navarro must report to prison pending his appeal unless the DC Circuit Court of Appeals blocks his order.

Judge Mehta barred Navarro from making the executive privilege argument after DOJ prosecutors accused the former Trump aide of ‘hiding behind executive privilege claims.’

Biden’s DOJ has abused Dr. Navarro throughout the entire process.

According to Navarro, the feds put him in leg irons and threw him in a cell last year.

Hunter Biden is a free man. He traveled with Joe Biden to Camp David for Easter and enjoyed the White House Easter Egg Roll while Peter Navarro rots in prison.

Here's a clip of Hunter escorting Joe Biden around today's White House Easter Egg Roll pic.twitter.com/BirJjOlG1Y

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) April 1, 2024

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/04/are-you-kidding-me-biden-appointed-judge-rips/

Tim Scott launches talk show with fellow black Republicans in Congress

Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC) launched a new talk show Friday, with four other black Republicans as his fellow hosts.

America’s Starting Five aired the first part of its first episode, which focused on the stereotype that black people are inevitably Democratic voters and politicians. Reps. Burgess Owens (R-UT), Byron Donalds (R-FL), John James (R-MI), and Wesley Hunt (R-TX) rounded out the five mentioned in the title in what will be a series on the podcast, according to Scott’s YouTube channel.

“In the first episode, the group discusses Joe Biden’s ‘you ain’t Black’ comments, what it means to be a Black Republican, and the growing coalition of Black Republicans,” the video caption reads.

The reference was to Biden’s appearance on Charlamagne tha God’s podcast where he suggested to viewers that “if you have a problem figuring out whether you’re for me or [former President Donald] Trump, you ain’t black.” The episode also featured another clip of Biden saying that “poor kids are just as bright and just as talented as white kids.” Both clips caused the hosts to burst into laughter.

“Look, listen, here are four non-black black people,” Scott said. “The good news is in 2024, looks like four out of 10 of us aren’t black enough for Joe Biden.”

“Here’s the thing: I don’t think these are gaffes,” James said. “I think Joe Biden is as serious as all get. I think this is exactly what he thinks.”

Scott has often come under fire for his conservative values. From the beginning of Biden’s presidency, Scott has been a vocal opponent, even delivering the GOP rebuttal to Biden’s first State of the Union address.

All of the America’s Starting Five hosts represent majority white districts, and in Scott’s case, a majority white state.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/senate/2955731/tim-scott-talk-show-fellow-black-republicans-congress/

America's Starting Five | Part 1

4:34

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWPuzDFU_Go

The New York Judge Who Gagged Trump Should Recuse HimselfIs it any wonder that many Americans have lost confidence in courts of law?

The judge in Donald Trump’s upcoming Manhattan trial harbors a contempt for the rule of law that is sadly typical these days of liberal jurists.

Inflamed by Trump’s public salvos about the unfairness of the case against him, Judge Juan Merchan imposed a gag order preventing the former president from criticizing court staff and members of their families, including his honor’s adult daughter.

Let’s begin with the basics. Gag orders are almost always a prior restraint on speech and presumptively unconstitutional. Silencing a defendant violates his or her First Amendment rights. Such orders are often a judicial abuse of law, but some judges do it anyway because they’re imperious, arrogant, and can get away with it. By the time a gagged defendant appeals, it is invariably too late. The trial is over.

As the leading candidate for President, Trump has an elevated right to exercise his freedom of expression, especially where his opponents have weaponized the law by bringing politically motivated charges against him to unduly influence the upcoming election.

Judge Juan Merchan and DA Alvin Bragg have forsaken their duties by making a mockery of ethical standards.

Anyone accused of a crime has a constitutionally-protected right to defend himself in a court of law, as well as the court of public opinion. That includes justified criticism of the trial judge who has a noted history of liberal bias. Merchan donated to Trump’s opponent, Joe Biden, and also gave money to an anti-Trump cause, although the amount was small.

But the judge’s daughter is also fair game for criticism. Loren Merchan is a public figure who runs a prominent progressive political consulting firm that handles outspoken Trump opponents like Adam Schiff, who was infamously censured by his own colleagues in Congress for peddling endless lies about Trump and the notorious Russia Hoax.

Significantly, Merchan’s daughter has a financial or economic interest in her father’s case. She and her clients raised some $93 million in campaign donations by citing the Trump prosecution in their solicitation mailings, according to reporting by The New York Post.

On this basis alone, Judge Merchan was obligated to recuse himself because a member of his family —which is identified a child under strict ethical guidelines— has a private, vested interest in the outcome of the case. Yet, he refuses to step aside despite the glaring conflict of interest. Meaning, the fix is in.

There’s no exemption under the First Amendment protecting the family members of judges. Merchan’s gag order is as wrongful as his decision not to disqualify himself in favor of a different judge who has no such conflict and might actually be objective and neutral. The appearance of impropriety, by itself, is sufficient for recusal under Section 100.2 of the Code of Judicial Conduct in New York.

In his gag order, Merchan would have us believe that Trump’s comments may induce violent threats. Yet, there is no evidence that. If it were otherwise, the former president would be charged with obstruction or tampering. But he hasn’t been because he confined his remarks to complaints about an inability to obtain a fair trial in New York from a compromised judge and a Democrat District Attorney, Alvin Bragg, who brought an anemic and time-barred prosecution by contorting the law.

It’s perfectly okay for witnesses such as Stormy Daniels and confessed liar Michael Cohen to trash Trump in their endless interviews and public comments, but the victim of their attacks is gagged? The double standard should be obvious to all.

This unequal application of the law was compounded when a federal judge, Reggie Walton, recently appeared on CNN for the sole purpose of condemning Trump. But the target of Walton’s ire, citizen Trump, has his free speech rights curtailed?

The right to a fair trial embodied in the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments protects the accused, not the accuser or the judge. They have no such right. But they do have sacred obligations to see that justice is done fairly, equitably, and impartially.

Both Judge Juan Merchan and DA Alvin Bragg have forsaken their duties by making a mockery of ethical standards. They have failed to uphold the integrity of our legal system and the honor of judicial independence.

Is it any wonder that many Americans have lost confidence in courts of law?

https://thegreggjarrett.com/the-new-york-judge-who-gagged-trump-should-recuse-himself/

>>20686534

Kash Patel

@Kash

Apr 06, 2024, 5:47 AM

https://truthsocial.com/@Kash/posts/112223641628163245