We are waiting for a reporter to ask the ultimate question.

Article: First step in unsealing court records: try asking

"Sometimes a simple letter from a reporter will prompt a court to disclose sealed documents"

Could Q be saying a reporter needs to ask about the 40,485 sealed documents?

sauce:

https://www.rcfp.org/browse-media-law-resources/news-media-law/news-media-and-law-fall-2014/first-step-unsealing-court-re

"Last month, judges in two different courts unsealed records in response to informal letter requests from journalists — not formal motions prepared by lawyers. "

>>1952489

We are waiting for a reporter to ask the ultimate question.

What are they waiting for?

They can end this at any time simply by asking POTUS, right?

We may have to ‘force’ this one.

Q

Here's a sample letter. SEE PIC

SO SIMPLE!

https://bostoncollegesubpoena.wordpress.com/2014/05/21/nbc-news-seeks-subpoenaed-interviews-from-boston-court/nbc1/

UNSEAL THE 40,483 DOCS!

#UNSEALDOCS

>>2069041

I watched this last night and couldn't help but think they are trying to raise doubt over any videos released by Q.

Think about it…the only reliable evidence is Bank Transactions.

Video can be manipulated so Fake News will rip apart any video Q releases.

Audio can be manipulated so Fake News will rip apart any audio Q releases.

Pics can be shopped so Fake News will rip apart any pics Q releases.

Bank Statements is where it's at!!!

>>2069085

>How are we going to find a reporter to do this.

I've always wondered….what makes a reporter so special that only they can write a letter to have sealed docs unsealed. Why can't the PEOPLE write a letter and ask that the docs get unsealed? Does the law really say a reporter? I'm digging.

#UNSEALDOCS

>>2069061

hrrrmmm…

"They will both be out of business in 7 years!"

7 YEARS

-Keep records for 7 years if you file a claim for a loss from worthless securities or bad debt deduction.

They will both be under close scrutiny now and are only in business because of CORRUPTION!

>>2069251

POTUS tweet just now "Out of business in 7 years"

SEE PIC

7 years is significant because financial records must be kept for 7 years.

POTUS means they will be under close scrutiny now and have grown fat on corruption instead of legitimate business.

No more corruption allowed means they can't keep their head above water!

>>2069041

Interesting you posted this at the exact time as POTUS' tweet about 7 years. I immediately thought of financial records and look at my post to you about how financial records are the only thing we can depend on! See >>2069087

COINCIDENCE?

>>2069486

Sounds like what they do to left-behind parents in this country.

BAKER

NOTABLE

>>2069399 Pruitt resignation part of the plan?

>>2069399

210 day facts in relation to last Q 7/4/18

SEE PICS

Dec 6, 2017 210 days before July 4, 2018

Jan 30, 2019 210 days after July 4, 2018