I know a thing or two about Journalism. The article, imho, is the best to date in that the writer apparently asked good questions and included many quotes. However, the use of anonymous sources is ALWAYS sketchy, but given the context, I don't know how else it could have been written. In terms of content, what we see are a few Anon's, and the writer's, interpretations of the Q Anon movement. That said, it would be extremely difficult, if not impossible, to write a truly objective piece, even if the writer spent 24/7 here. So all in all, it's a fair enough piece.
As for the "other" article, recently posted, I had to KEK that the site charges $2.00 at minimum to make a comment. And yes, it's a Jewish site.
https://www.tabletmag.com/scroll/264627/the-story-of-q